IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, N.SENTHILKUMAR
K.G. Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By The Commissioner And Secretary To Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial overview of proceedings and orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the property in question and historical context. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. sale process details and initial objections. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court decisions regarding the sale and grounds for objections. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. subsequent developments and legal challenges to the sale. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. legal findings on land ownership and rights. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 7. the role of state government in temple property management. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. legal arguments from both parties regarding property sales. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. consideration of alternative arguments and objections. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 10. implications of statutory provisions on property transfer. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
W.A.Nos.1535 and 1536 of 2014 had been disposed on 23.03.2018. As against the same, R.Subramanian and S.Vaidiyanathan approached the Supreme Court in S.L.P.(C) No.11046 of 2025 and S.L.P.(C) No.21088 of 2025 on the ground that the disposal of the Writ Appeals had been without reference to C.M.P.Nos.16314 of 2018 in W.A.No.1535 of 2014 and C.M.P.Nos.16315 and 16316 of 2018 in W.A.No.1536 of 2014








Dr.Subramanian Swamy V. State of Tamil Nadu and others
Air Line Pilots’ Association of India v Director General of Civil Aviation &Others
K.Kumara Gupta v Sri Markendaya and Sri Omkareswara Swamy Temple and Others
Bharat Singh and Others v State of Haryana and others
M.Ramanatha Pillai v The State of Kerala and another
The Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd v Sipahi Singh and others
Budhia Swain and others v Gopinath Deb and others
Casio India Company Private Limited v State of Haryana
Union of India and others v Dileep Kumar Singh
J.R.Raghupathy and others v State of A.P. & Others
Mohd.Shahabuddin v State of Bihar & Others
Prabodh Verma and others v State of Uttar Pradesh and others
The auction of temple property was rendered invalid due to significant procedural violations under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutor....
The court ruled that the lease of temple property was unjustifiable due to non-compliance with statutory requirements and lack of necessity, emphasizing the prioritization of temple interests over pu....
A lease for temple property must demonstrate necessity and benefit to the deity; merely augmenting income is insufficient and procedural violations render the decision unjustifiable.
The court ruled that temple property cannot be alienated by trustees without obtaining necessary permissions and demonstrating community consent as per applicable law.
The requirement of prior sanction for sale of temple properties under the TamilNadu Hindu Religious and Charitable and Endowments Act, 1959, and the legal principle that an agreement to sell does not....
Procedural irregularities in public lease transactions do not invalidate the purpose when the object serves public welfare.
Transactions involving temple properties without the knowledge of the temple authorities and the HR&CE Department are not binding, and the HR&CE Department has the authority to protect temple propert....
(1) Auction Sale of Land – After public auction is held and highest bid is received and property is sold in a public auction in favour of a highest bidder, such a sale cannot be set aside on the basi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.