SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ.
Gaurav Bandhu – Petitioner
Versus
The Secretary to GOI, Department of Atomic Energy – Respondent
W.P.Nos.3445 of 2024, 31154, 31094, 31098, 31103, 30721, 31085, 31090 of 2025 & 3022 of 2019 & WMP.Nos.34864, 34861, 34848, 34851, 34858 & 34414 of 2025
Decided On : 17-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.V. Arun.
For the Respondents: Mr. K.S. Jeyaganeshan, Senior Panel Counsel.

Pension rights cannot be denied based on belated option exercise when similarly situated employees are allowed to switch, affirming equality before the law under Article 14.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Pension Scheme - As per Office Memorandum dated 12.10.2000, employees who have completed less than 20 years of service at a specified date are entitled to opt for switch over from Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) to General Provident Fund (GPF) - Court reaffirmed that pension rights cannot be denied based on belated exercise of option when similarly situated employees have been allowed to switch - Employees who opted for switch before stipulated time entitled to receive pension from retirement date without undue discrimination - The impugned orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal granting relief to the employees were upheld. (Paras 9, 30, 36)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Advisory in nature - Not an appeal - Court’s role is to supervise decision-making processes rather than adjudicate on substantive issues - Prior judgments must be honored to maintain judicial integrity and consistency in service jurisprudence. (Paras 14, 21, 32)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners are employees claiming the right to switch from CPF to GPF based on various office memoranda which permitted a switch on certain conditions. The Central Administrative Tribunal issued orders allowing the switch for some employees while denying it to others based on timing and eligibility, leading to these writ petitions.

Findings of Court:
The judgment under review indicates that the employees who had timely exercised their option for switch from CPF to GPF are entitled to the benefit and must receive pension from retirement date along with any due arrears.

Issues: The key issue involves the interpretation of the office memoranda regarding the eligibility of employees to switch from CPF to GPF and the retrospective effect of earlier judgments confirming such rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that denying the option to switch from CPF to GPF would breach the principles of equality before the law and non-discrimination contained in Article 14 of the Constitution, affirming prior decisions granting similar relief to other employees.

Result: Writ petitions allowed for the employees who timely opted for switch; impugned orders of the Tribunal upheld.

Table of Content
1. common issues in writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. employee pension options per om. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. tribunal ordered pension shift. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. dismissals based on previous decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. proper procedure for pension switches. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. equal treatment in pension eligibility. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27)
7. judicial decisions upheld unless challenged. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
8. belated option exercise permitted. (Para 34)
9. final decision on writ petitions. (Para 35)

ORDER :

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

Since the issue raised in all writ petitions are common, we clubbed the writ petitions together and heard the counsel.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as Writ Petitioners/employers and respondents/employees.

3. Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (hereinafter referred to as ‘IGCAR’), Kalpakkam. Chennai has four categories of employees. They are

(i) Scientific;

(ii) Technical;

(iii) Auxiliary; and

(iv) Administration

4. As per the Office Memorandum dated 17.04.1964 and17.01.1967, technical employees were covered under the pension scheme. On confirmation, they were entitled to exercise an option either to be retained in the Contributory Provident Fund (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPF’) scheme or to switch over to the Pension Scheme (hereinafter referred to as ‘GPF’). In terms of the then prevailing office memorandum, if no specific option was submitted by the technical employees, they were deemed to have opted for GPF pension scheme. Applicants before the Tribunal had opted to be covered under the CPF Scheme..

5. The employer issued another Office Memorandum on12.10.1992 permitting one more option to switch over be exercised by the technical employees, provided, they had not completed 20 years of service as on 01.08.1992. Subsequently, another Office Memorandum was issued on 23.07.1996. In terms of this Office Memorandum, the employer informed all the technical employees, who had exercised their option at the time of confirmation of their service, that they can opt again whether to switch over from GPF to CPF scheme. The said Office Memorandum is extracted as hereunder:

“The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM.. dated 12.10.1992 on the subject mentioned above and to say that the Scheme of Pensionary/Terminal benefits for the Scientific and Technical Personnel hereinafter referred to as S&T Personnel, working in the Department of Electronics, Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Space has been further reviewed by the Government in consultation with the several Departments. As a result of the review, it has been decided to mentioned Status Quo ante, as prevailing prior to the issue of above mentioned orders, in respect of the pensionary/terminal benefits admissible to Scientific and Technical personnel in the 3 Departments who were in service as on 01.08.1992. They will continue to be governed in the matter of their pensionary/Terminal benefits by the orders issued by the respective Departments from time to time.

2.In the case of S&T Personnel in the 3 Departments who joined service on or after 01.08.1992, it has been decided to follow the uniform policy as enumerated below:

i) All S&T Personnel Joining Department of Atomic Energy, Department of Space and Department of Electronics and such other Scientific Departments as have adopted the system prevailing in the Department of Atomic Energy will initially be appointed in CPF Scheme.

ii) The S&T Personnel will have one option to be exercised any time but not later than completion of 20 years qualifying service to switch-over from CPF to Pension Scheme or to retain the CPF Scheme as they may wish.

iii) Those who do not exercise any option within the specified period will be deemed to have opted for switch over to Pension Scheme.

iv) The option once exercised will be final. Thus changeover from Pension Scheme to CPF Scheme is not permitted.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top