IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ.
Gaurav Bandhu – Petitioner
Versus
The Secretary to GOI, Department of Atomic Energy – Respondent
W.P.Nos.3445 of 2024, 31154, 31094, 31098, 31103, 30721, 31085, 31090 of 2025 & 3022 of 2019 & WMP.Nos.34864, 34861, 34848, 34851, 34858 & 34414 of 2025
Decided On : 17-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. employee pension options per om. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. tribunal ordered pension shift. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. dismissals based on previous decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. proper procedure for pension switches. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. equal treatment in pension eligibility. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. judicial decisions upheld unless challenged. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. belated option exercise permitted. (Para 34) |
| 9. final decision on writ petitions. (Para 35) |
ORDER :
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
Since the issue raised in all writ petitions are common, we clubbed the writ petitions together and heard the counsel.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as Writ Petitioners/employers and respondents/employees.
3. Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (hereinafter referred to as ‘IGCAR’), Kalpakkam. Chennai has four categories of employees. They are
(i) Scientific;
(ii) Technical;
(iii) Auxiliary; and
(iv) Administration
4. As per the Office Memorandum dated 17.04.1964 and17.01.1967, technical employees were covered under the pension scheme. On confirmation, they were entitled to exercise an option either to be retained in the Contributory Provident Fund (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPF’) scheme or to switch over to the Pension Scheme (hereinafter referred to as ‘GPF’). In terms of the then prevailing office memorandum, if no specific option was submitted by the technical employees, they were deemed to have opted for GPF pension scheme. Applicants before the Tribunal had opted to be covered under the CPF Scheme..
5. The employer issued another Office Memorandum on12.10.1992 permitting one more option to switch over be exercised by the technical employees, provided, they had not completed 20 years of service as on 01.08.1992. Subsequently, another Office Memorandum was issued on 23.07.1996. In terms of this Office Memorandum, the employer informed all the technical employees, who had exercised their option at the time of confirmation of their service, that they can opt again whether to switch over from GPF to CPF scheme. The said Office Memorandum is extracted as hereunder:
“The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM.. dated 12.10.1992 on the subject mentioned above and to say that the Scheme of Pensionary/Terminal benefits for the Scientific and Technical Personnel hereinafter referred to as S&T Personnel, working in the Department of Electronics, Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Space has been further reviewed by the Government in consultation with the several Departments. As a result of the review, it has been decided to mentioned Status Quo ante, as prevailing prior to the issue of above mentioned orders, in respect of the pensionary/terminal benefits admissible to Scientific and Technical personnel in the 3 Departments who were in service as on 01.08.1992. They will continue to be governed in the matter of their pensionary/Terminal benefits by the orders issued by the respective Departments from time to time.
2.In the case of S&T Personnel in the 3 Departments who joined service on or after 01.08.1992, it has been decided to follow the uniform policy as enumerated below:
i) All S&T Personnel Joining Department of Atomic Energy, Department of Space and Department of Electronics and such other Scientific Departments as have adopted the system prevailing in the Department of Atomic Energy will initially be appointed in CPF Scheme.
ii) The S&T Personnel will have one option to be exercised any time but not later than completion of 20 years qualifying service to switch-over from CPF to Pension Scheme or to retain the CPF Scheme as they may wish.
iii) Those who do not exercise any option within the specified period will be deemed to have opted for switch over to Pension Scheme.
iv) The option once exercised will be final. Thus changeover from Pension Scheme to CPF Scheme is not permitted.
3.



Pension rights cannot be denied based on belated option exercise when similarly situated employees are allowed to switch, affirming equality before the law under Article 14.
Employees have the right to switch from CPF to GPF cum Pension Scheme if they applied before retirement, as established by precedent.
The court affirmed that failure to exercise the option to switch from CPF to GPF within stipulated timelines renders later requests invalid, underlining the importance of adherence to administrative ....
The legal fiction created by the Office Memorandum automatically migrated existing employees to the GPF scheme, and the burden was on the employee to exercise the option to remain under the CPF schem....
Pension is a right and not a bounty; delay in opting for pension benefits due to ignorance or miscommunication does not bar entitlement.
An employee's voluntary choice of a Provident Fund scheme is irrevocable, and one cannot seek later changes after long acquiescence, reaffirmed by binding precedent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.