SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3686

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Ram Swarup Rajput And  others - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India And others - Respondents 
WRIT - A No. - 11186 of 2022 
Decided On : 05-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pramod Kumar, Sanjeev Singh
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I., Rohan Gupta

The court affirmed that failure to exercise the option to switch from CPF to GPF within stipulated timelines renders later requests invalid, underlining the importance of adherence to administrative cut-off dates.

Headnote:(A) Office Memorandum dated 01.05.1987 - Switching from Contributory Provident Fund to General Provident Fund-cum-Pension Scheme - Petitioners claimed rejection of their switching applications after multiple attempts. (Paras 1-2, 10, 17)

(B) Legal interpretation of adoption of Office Memorandum and adherence to option cut-off dates were pivotal in determining eligibility for the pension scheme. (Paras 13-20)

(C) The judgment also highlights issues of equitable treatment of similarly situated employees across different institutions and the implications of the timing of option submissions. (Paras 7-10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, employed at IIT Kanpur, sought redressal of recurring rejections of their applications to switch to the GPF Scheme from CPF, with dates for options having passed. (Paras 1-2)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the rejection for petitioners 1 and 3 as they had exercised their options to remain in CPF multiple times, while allowing petitioner's claims regarding return of CPF contributions with interest. (Paras 22-23)

Issues: Whether the petitioners had valid grounds to switch from CPF to GPF Scheme, considering the cut-off dates for exercising options.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that non-compliance with the established deadlines for opting out of CPF to GPF renders such subsequent claims invalid, confirming the institutional adoption of the O.M. was properly executed.

Result: Writ petition allowed for petitioner-2; dismissed for petitioners-1 and 3.

Table of Content
1. petitioners' applications to switch from cpf to gpf were rejected. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6)
2. arguments focus on the adoption and application of the o.m. dated 01.05.1987. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court analyzes the implications of adoption of pension schemes. (Para 12 , 16 , 20)
4. the claim of petitioners 1 and 3 is rejected based on non-est argument. (Para 19 , 21)
5. final decision allows petitioner's claim while rejecting others. (Para 23)

JUDGMENT :

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

1. Petitioners (3 in numbers) are aggrieved that their applications to allow them to switch-over from Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (for short “CPF”) to General Provident Fund-cum-Pension Scheme (for short “GPF”) were rejected vide order dated 16.09.2021.

2. The petitioners – 1, 2 and 3 have worked as Teacher (Mechanic-B), Instrumentation Engineer (Chemical Engineering) and Teacher respectively in Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur.

3. In the impugned order, there are reference of as many as 11 letters/communications whereby earlier also, aforesaid claim of petitioners was rejected and by way of amendment sought in this writ petition, all letters/communications are also challenged.

4. Before considering rival submissions, few facts which would be relevant are mentioned below :-

“a. The Government of India has issued an Office Memorandum dated 01.05.1987 on a subject “Change over of the Central Government employees from the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme to Pension Scheme-Implementation of the commendations of the Fourth Central Pay Commission. Salient features of said Office Memorandum are reproduced hereinafter:

1. The undersigned is directed to state that the Central Government employees who are governed by the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (CPF Scheme) have been given repeated options in the past to come over to the Pension Scheme. The last such option was given in the Department of Personnel and Training O.M. No. F3(1)-Pension unit/85 dated the 6th June, 1985. However, some Central Government employees still continue under the CPF Scheme. The Fourth Central Pay Commission has now recommended that all CPF beneficiaries in service on January 1, 1986, should be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme on that date unless they specifically opt out to continue under the CPF Scheme.

2. After careful consideration the President is pleased to decide that the said recommendation shall be accepted and implemented in the manner hereinafter indicated.

3. All CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986 and who are still in service on the date of issue of these orders will be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme.

3.2. The employees of the category mentioned above will, however, have an option to continue under the CPF Scheme, if they so desire. The option will have to be exercised and conveyed to the concerned Head of Office by 30.09.1987 in the form enclosed if the employees wish to continue under the CPF Scheme. If no option is received by the Head of Office by the above date the employees will be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme.

3.3. The CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986, but have since retired and in whose case retirement benefits have also been paid under the CPF Scheme, will have an option to have their retirement benefits calculated under the Pension Scheme provided they refund to the Government, the Government contribution to the Contributory Provident Fund and the interest thereon, drawn by them at the time of settlement of the CPF Account. Such option shall be exercised latest by 30.09.1987.

3.4. In the case of CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986 but have since retired, and in whose case the CPF Account has not already been paid, will be allowed retirement benefits as if they were borne on pensionable establishments unless they specifically opt by 30.09.1987 to have their retirement benefits settled under the CPF Scheme.

3.5 in the case of CPF beneficiaries, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top