Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.MALA
Idols of Sri Jambukeswarar and Akilandeswari of the Temple of Jambukeswarar and Akilandeswari, Thiruvanikoil, Trichy Taluk by its Executive Officer – Appellant
Versus
Rasaiyan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. MALA, J.
The unsuccessful plaintiff before the courts below is the appellant in the Second Appeal. The Second Appeal is filed against the confirming judgment of the lower appellate court in A.S.No.327 of 1991 on the file of Principal District Court, Tiruchirappalli.
2. For narrative convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.
3. The plaintiff is the temple of Sri Jambukeswarar and Akilandeswari, Tiruchirappalli represented by its Executive Officer. According to the plaintiff, the suit land is Iruvaram Inam land granted in favour of the plaintiff temple by inam title deed No.722. The plaintiff states that twin interests of Melawaram and Kudiwaram vested in the temple. By the proceedings in case No.54/70, on 16.05.1970 ryotwari patta was granted to the plaintiff temple. The plaintiff states that the suit land is a portion of the land comprised in its title deeds including in the order of the Settlement Tahsildar. According to the plaintiff, the order of the Settlement Tahsildar was not appealed and thus attained finality. The plaintiff states that the first defendant is in actual possession and enjoyment of the suit land and is cultiva
Statutory grants of title following inam abolition provide the necessary basis to recover possession without seeking additional title declaration.
The temple established its title over properties through legal processes, while defendants failed to prove their claims, leading to dismissal of appeals.
The jurisdiction of the High Court in second appeals under Section 100 is limited to substantial questions of law; it cannot reassess factual findings unless a clear error in law has been demonstrate....
The presumption of ownership under Section 44 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams Act requires appellants to provide evidence to rebut the established rights of religious institutions over inam lands.
Statutory presumption under Section 44 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams Act establishes ownership rights of religious institutions over inam lands, unless rebutted by substantial evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction under Section 21 of Act 30 of 1963, and the possession was not with the first defendant, but with the seco....
The Appellate Court erred by dismissing the cross-appeal without independent consideration, contravening procedural fairness, and the temple's claim to property based on service grant was upheld.
The jurisdiction of the Civil Court to entertain a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession is not barred by the grant of patta under the Inam Abolition Act, and the appellant must pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
