BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ.
Ramesh - Appellant
Versus
State, through, The Inspector of Police – Respondent
Crl.A(MD)No.572 of 2022
Decided On : 09-12-2025
JUDGMENT :
R.POORNIMA, J.
This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, in S.C.No.114 of 2017, dated 08/06/2022 and consequently to acquit the appellant.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused Ramesh and the complainant Mageshwari are husband and wife. They are blessed with two female children. The accused suspected the fidelity of the complainant. Due to which, there was misunderstanding between the couple. The complainant was living separately from the accused for the past six months. Both the children were living with the accused. Three months back, the accused contracted second marriage, the complainant requested the accused to hand over the two female children to her. However, the accused refused. So, she lodged a complaint before the All Women Police Station, Kodaikanal. On 12.04.2016 at about 06.00 am, with the consent of the accused two female children were handed over to the complainant. On the same day at about 09.00 pm, while the complainant, her mother, grand-mother and grand-father (deceased Ramar) along with the children were taking food in their house, the accused came there armed with a knife and demanded that the children be handed to him. When the grand-mother Pachiammal refused to hand over the children, the accused shouted alleging she was the reason for separating the children. Thereafter the accused took out a knife and stabbed on her neck and cheek, lower jaw and left hand indiscriminately. Immediately all the inmates raised hue and cry. The deceased Ramar attempted to intervene and prevent the accused, at that time the accused attacked him indiscriminately, causing stab injuries on his left rib, chest and stomach. The mother of the complainant also attempted to restrain the accused, where upon he stabbed her left chest and inflicted injury. When the complainant raised hue and cry the accused chased her and stabbed on her left forehand with the same knife. Thereafter, the neighbours who witnessed the occurrence rushed to the place of occurrence. The accused fled away from the scene of occurrence with knife. Subsequently all the injured persons were taken to Kodaikanal Government Hospital in a vehicle for treatment.
3. The complaint (Ex.P1) was received by P.W.16- Nagarajan from the complainant (P.W.1), while she was taking treatment in the Government Hospital, Kodaikanal and registered FIR (Ex.P11) in Crime No.158 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 294 (b), 324 and 307 IPC and sent the original complaint and FIR to the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal and the copies to the higher officials for reference and to the Inspector of Police for investigation.
4. After receipt of the FIR, Thiru.Muruganantham, (P.W.17) the Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal took the case for investigation and proceeded to the place of occurrence at 00.30 hours, on 13.04.2016 and prepared observation Mahazar under Ex.P2 and rough sketch (Ex.P12) in the presence of the witnesses Saiman Kumar and Rajkumar and also recovered blood-stained earth and ordinary earth (M.O.3 and M.O.4) in the Athachi (Ex.P3). Thereafter, he examined the witnesses Saimen Kumar and Rajkumar and recorded their statement. He examined the injured witnesses Mageswari, Pachiammal, Ramar (deceased) and Palaniammal and recorded their statement and also examined the witnesses Muniammal, Pawn Thai and Merryammal and recorded their statements. Thereafter, at 07.00 am, he arrested the accused on the Kodaikanal- Perumal Malai road Zion school junction in the presence of Mr. Susendran, Village Administrative Officer and Gunasekaran, Village Assistant and recorded the confession statement of the accused in Ex.P4 and recovered blood stained pink colour shirt (M.O.2) from the accused through recovery mahazar (Ex.P5). He also recovered the bloodstained knife (M.O.1) through mahazar (Ex.P6) in the presence of the same witnesses. Thereafter, he sent th
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had intentionally inflicted fatal injuries, leading to the conviction under multiple sections of the IPC.
The conviction was affirmed based on consistent eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence, notwithstanding minor inconsistencies.
The testimony of injured witnesses is accorded greater evidential value, establishing credibility unless major contradictions arise.
Eyewitness testimony, accused's conduct, confession, and forensic evidence prove attempted robbery and murder beyond doubt despite minor investigative lapses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of reliable and convincing evidence in proving the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt; contradictions in witness testimonies and procedural delays can undermine the case.
Delay in FIR and pre-FIR inquest not vitiating trial absent prejudice; reliable natural witness testimony, corroborated by medical/weapon evidence, suffices for murder conviction despite inconclusive....
A conviction under Section 302 IPC requires reliable evidence beyond hearsay; mere allegations without corroboration are insufficient for a guilty verdict.
Eyewitness testimony, particularly from injured witnesses, is crucial in establishing guilt, even with minor inconsistencies in their accounts.
(1) In order to constitute offence under Section 498A of IPC, prosecution has to establish that accused treated deceased with cruelty.(2) It is duty of Court while considering evidence to separate gr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.