IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
S. Subramanian – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department – Respondent
W.P.Nos.47695, 47697, 26183 and 26188 of 2025 And W.M.P.No.29494 of 2025
Decided On : 27-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of petitioners' appointments and 5% personal pay. (Para 6) |
| 2. petitioners argue against the withdrawal of personal pay. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. government's justification for denial of personal pay. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's recognition of established legal principles regarding recovery from retired employees. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's decision to quash the recovery and refix pension. (Para 14) |
| 6. final order regarding the allowance of certain writ petitions and directions for refund. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER :
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
Since the issue involved in these writ petitions are interrelated, they are heard together and disposed of by way of a common order.
2.W.P.No.47695 of 2025 has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Office of Accountant General (A&E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai 4th respondent herein to pay the pension on basic pay of Rs.34,750/- instead of Rs.36,850/- with eligible allowances every month without any deduction to the petitioner by commuting the pay of the petitioner on the date of retirement by merging the 5% PP with the revised scale of pay as on 10.09.1998.
3.W.P.No.47697 of 2025 has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Office of Accountant General (A&E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai dated 31.05.2019 having Ref.No.AG (A&E)/PEN PO6/10621447/3/R0621447 and having Ref.No.P08/4/10823980/ADK dated 25.09.2019 issued by the 4th respondent herein and quash the same in so far as the Office of the Accountant General (A&E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai holds that Personal Pay of 5% is allowed only on the pre revised scale of pay and not in the revised scale of pay and consequently direct the Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Manampathi, 5th respondent herein to refund the sum of Rs.3,18,610/- to the petitioner along with interest at 12% till date of refund.
4.W.P.No.26183 of 2025 has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Office of Accountant General (A&E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai dated 27.06.2024 having Ref No.PO8/3/10829334/ADK and 04.11.2024 having Ref.No.AG (A&E)/PEN/PO8/10830153/4/R0830153 4th respondent herein and quash the same in so far as the Office of the Accountant General (A&E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai holds that Personal Pay of 5% is allowed only on the pre revised scale of pay and not in the revised scale of pay and consequently direct the District Treasury, Dharmapuri 5th respondent herein to refund the sum of Rs.6,60,552/- to the petitioner along with interest at 12% till date of refund.
5.W.P.No.26188 of 2025 has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Office of Accountant General (A&E), Tamil Nadu, Chennai 4th respondent herein to pay the pension amount of Rs.44,500/- every month without any deduction to the petitioner by commuting the pay of the petitioner on the date of retirement by merging the 5% PP with the revised scale of pay as on 01.09.1998.
6.The brief facts of the case is that the petitioners were appointed as Leprosy Inspector on 10.09.1988 and 11.03.1988 respectively and was subsequently re-designated as Health Inspector Grade-I pursuant to various Government Orders. According to the petitioners, 5% Personal Pay (PP) which was sanctioned under G.O.Ms.No.664 dated 24.08.1992, was rightly merged with their revised scale of pay as per the proceedings of the second respondent dated 27.07.2015, and their pay was fixed accordingly upon award of Selection Grade. While so, the fourth respondent, by proceedings dated 31.05.2019 & 25.09.2019 and 27.06.2024 & 04.11.2024 respectively, held that the 5% Personal Pay ought to have been merged only with the pre-revised scale of pay and not with the revised scale, resulting in reduction of the petitioners last drawn salary and consequent reduction of pension. Further, a sum of Rs.3,18,610/- and Rs.6,60,552/- respectively, was ordered to be recovered treating the same as excess pay drawn, which amount wa
Recovery from retired employees is impermissible when excess payments are not due to misrepresentation or fraud.
Recovery of excess pay from retired employees impermissible absent fraud or misrepresentation.
Recovery of excess payments from retired employees is impermissible without adherence to natural justice, especially when payments were made for an extended period without notice.
The court emphasized that recovery from a retired employee for excess payment without prior notice is impermissible under established legal principles.
Recoveries from retired Group-C employees without prior notice are impermissible under established legal principles, reaffirming the need for due process in excess payment cases.
Pension must be refixed by merging 5% Personal Pay with revised scale of pay as on 01.09.1998, following quashing of recovery.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.