SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 524

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.MURALI SHANKAR
M. Madasamy – Appellant
Versus
P. Murugan @ Murugaiah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Mahesh Babu
For the Respondent: P. Rajkumar

ORDER :

1. The above application has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 770 days in filing the second appeal against the judgment and decree made in A.S. No.133 of 2019, dated 13.10.2022 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.128 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli, dated 11.01.2019.

2. The appellant as plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.128 of 2015, on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli, claiming the reliefs to declare that the suit property is belonging to the plaintiff and for consequential permanent injunction, restraining the defendant and his men from in any manner interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

3. The respondent/defendant filed a written statement and contested the suit. The learned I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli, after framing necessary issues and after full trial, passed the judgment, dated 11.01.2019, dismissing the suit. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit, the plaintiff filed an appeal in A.S.No.133 of 2019 and the learned Principal Sub Judge, Tir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top