SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 636

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, JJ.
The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
The National Missionary Society of India, Rep. by its General Secretary – Respondent
W.A. No.125 of 2015, M.P. No. 1 of 2015, C.M.P. Nos. 11247, 11248 of 2025
Decided On : 12-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : U. Baranidharan
For the Respondents: M.K. Kabir, J. Chelladurai Caldwell, N. Venkateswaran

The transfer of trusteeship is deemed a 'settlement' under Article 58(ii) of the Indian Stamp Act, affirming that no conveyance occurred, but rather a handing over of management for charitable purposes.

Headnote:(A) Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Articles 58 and 62 - Writ appeal challenging the decision which classified a document as covered under Article 62(e) while appellants argued it fell under Article 58(a)(ii) - The document in question being a 'Transfer of Trusteeship Declaration' did not constitute a settlement, hence stamp duty was erroneously assessed - The court ruled that the Subject Deed is a settlement under Article 58(ii) of the Stamp Act, as it involves a transfer of property for charitable purposes and satisfies the definition of 'settlement' in Section 2(24) of the Stamp Act. (Paras 25, 29, and 30)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, the State, contested the classification of a document transferring trusteeship rights of the Christu Kula Ashram Trust to the National Missionary Society of India. The original trustees faced difficulties due to age and resolved to transfer management responsibilities. The State assessed additional stamp duty, which was disputed before the court.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the view that the transfer of trusteeship constituted a 'settlement' and therefore, should attract stamp duty under Article 58(ii), not Article 62(e).

Issues: The critical issues were whether the trustees could legally transfer property and whether there was any consideration involved that would classify the instrument as a settlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court explained that the trustees, despite not owning the property, hold authority to manage and transfer it. The existence of obligations placed on transferees also satisfied the consideration requirement, establishing the document as a settlement under Article 58.

Result: Writ appeal allowed, confirming the imposition of stamp duty under Article 58(ii).

Table of Content
1. case introduction and background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the subject deed and its implications. (Para 3 , 4)
3. consequences of deficit stamp duty demands. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's observations on parties' positions. (Para 7 , 9)
5. arguments from the appellants and respondents. (Para 10 , 11)
6. legal standards pertaining to stamp duty. (Para 12 , 13)
7. interpretation of disposition and settlements. (Para 19)
8. analysis of subject deed's purpose and implications. (Para 20 , 22 , 23 , 24)
9. findings and justifications on stamp duty applicability. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
10. final decision and outcome. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT :

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

1. Writ Appeal is filed by the State challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated 04.03.2011 insofar as it set aside the order dated 22.02.2010 and treating/finding Document dated 01.03.1999 bearing No.4240 of 2002 titled as “Transfer of Trusteeship Declaration” dated 26.07.2002 as covered under Article 62(e) of the Stamp Act while rejecting the contention of the State, i.e., appellant herein that the document/Deed of “Transfer of Trusteeship Declaration”, (hereinafter referred to as “Subject Deed”) would be covered under Article 58(a)(ii) of the Indian Stamp Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Stamp Act').

2. Brief facts:-

2.1. For sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank set out in the writ petition.

2.2. Petitioner is a religious and charitable institution registered under the Societies Registration Act. Petitioner is primarily engaged in charitable works. Christu Kula Charitable Trust a registered Trust (hereinafter referred to as 'Trust'), an Ashram, ran an orphanage to help destitute and deserted children. The purpose of the Trust is to render selfless service to sick and poor, especially, villagers. Trust also had as its object, establishment of Educational Institution. Trust properties / money was, held by trustees who were to be appointed by Sevaks. Trust was to have five trustees, three from Ashram's Sevaks and two from outside the Ashram. Trust Deed provided that if Ashram Sevaks find themselves unable to run one or both of these institutions, i.e., hospital (or) school, they may discontinue either one or both, for such time as may be required. If at any time, Trust is dissolved or discontinued, Trust Deed provides that Rs.3,00,000/-, reserved for the Hospital and Rs.50,000/- for the school, shall be handed over to National Missionary Society of India, i.e., petitioner, to be used for the purposes set out in Appendix 'A' Rule X of Trust Deed.

2.3. Trustees faced difficulties in discharging their obligation primarily due to their old age. It was thus decided to handover the Management or Trusteeship of the Trust in the manner provided under the Trust Deed. Pursuant thereto, a resolution dated 26.02.1999 was passed and “Subject Deed” was executed by the Christu Kula Ashram Trust represented by its Trustees in favour of the petitioner Society, which was referred as Transferee Trustees and represented by its Governing body.

3. The above “Subject Deed” dated 01.03.1999 inter alia provided for the following:

a) Christu Kula Ashram Trust resolved to merge with the National Missionary Society of India.

b) Properties of the above Trust mentioned in the Schedule to the above Deed was to be vested with the Transferee Trust (or) Trustee i.e., the petitioner herein, who shall hold the same for the purposes and objectives of the Trust for which the transferor trustees were holding the same until the date of execution of the said Deed.

4. The Subject Deed was presented for registration by paying duty of Rupees 300/- (Rs.90+210). However, Registering Authority demanded a sum of Rs.70,000/- as deficit stamp duty vide letter dated 26.04.2001. Thereafter, notice dated 04.06.2004 was issued and a further sum of Rs.21,16,779/-, comprising of Rs.19,16,779/- towards duty and Rs.1,53,000/- towards penalty, was demanded. It is stated that the Accountant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top