IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Devendiran, S/o.Vinayagam Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Anna University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the petitioner's appointment (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. treatment and roles of petitioners as teaching fellows (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's prior decisions regarding similar cases (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. consideration for regularization of temporary positions (Para 16 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. final rulings on appointment and pay stipulations (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
ORDER :
These writ petitions have been filed challenging the order passed by the Registrar, Anna University dated 28.07.2025, thereby, restricted the extension of the petitioners’ service till 31.08.2025.
3. In the process of regularisation of adhoc appointees, if the adhoc appointees fulfil all requirements under the 1st respondent, they may be considered for regularisation. However, the said recommendations were not given effect.
5. Though the petitioners were selected as teaching fellows, they were performing the job of Assistant Professor, in all aspects. They have also performed the duties of examination hall supervisor, correction of answer papers of students, external examiner for practical examinations, Anna University examination representative, University question paper key setting and projects and viva-voc
State of Punjab Vs. Jagjit Singh and Ors.
Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology v. Manoj K. Mohanty
Prolonged temporary appointments can establish grounds for regularization and equal pay for equal work, emphasizing adherence to university regulations.
Absorption of adhoc faculty as Assistant Professors affirmed, emphasizing equal pay for equal work and recognition of long-term service.
Temporary faculty are entitled to regularization and must receive parity in pay with regular faculty due to equivalent duties performed and legal obligations unmet by the university.
Regularization of public employment requires adherence to established recruitment processes; negative equality cannot justify irregular appointments.
Contractual employees have no right to claim regularization or equivalent benefits unless stipulated by law, as established by precedent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.