Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN
Mani @ Manikantan – Appellant
Versus
State, Rep. by The Inspector of Police (L&O) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to prosecution established. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence supports prosecution's case. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 4. culpable homicide established beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 22) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; conviction upheld. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT
M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
The sole accused in Crime No.547 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police, has filed this Criminal Appeal challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 20.09.2018 in SC.No.254 of 2012 passed by the learned Mahila Court, Chennai, in and by which trial Court has convicted and sentenced him as under:
| Charges Framed under Section | Conviction under Section | Sentence of Imprisonment |
|---|---|---|
| 302 IPC | 302 IPC | Imprisonment for Life and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- in default to undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment. |
| 294(b) IPC | 294(b) IPC | Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 months |
| 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act | 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act | Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment. |
2. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell are as follows:
2.1. PW1 is the mother of t
The court established that a one-sided love obsession, evidenced by eyewitness and medical testimony, suffices to support a murder conviction under applicable laws.
The conviction for murder was upheld based on substantial eyewitness testimony and evidence of motive, affirming the principle that direct evidence substantiates a guilty verdict beyond reasonable do....
The conviction for murder upheld, highlighting that circumstantial evidence and established patterns of cruelty can substantiate claims beyond reasonable doubt.
The court established that a conviction for murder can be sustained on the basis of circumstantial evidence, provided that the evidence forms a complete chain that leads to the only reasonable conclu....
The court affirmed the conviction for murder under Section 302 and assault under Section 324, ruling that credible eyewitness testimonies and medical evidence met the burden of proof beyond reasonabl....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
