SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5487

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
Golden Educational Trust  Through its Trustee Sivakami Murugan W/o Murugan – Appellant 
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board Chennai, through its Chief Executive Officer – Respondent 
C.R.P. (MD) NOS. 247 OF 2008 & 1051 OF 2017 AND TR. A.S. (MD) NO. 222 OF 2009 C.R.P. (MD) No.247 of 2008
Decided on : 04-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.P.Senthil Kumar Mr. M.S.Suresh Kumar
For the Respondent: Mr. M.S.Suresh Kumar Mr. S.Kumar Mr. G.Chandrasekaran Mr. S.Kumar

The irreversibility of wakf property transactions based on the Wakf Act's provisions prohibits alienation, upholding the integrity of religious and charitable purposes over contested claims.

Headnote:(A) Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 3(r)(iv), 5, 7(3), 27, 52 - Dispute over wakf property ownership - Properties dedicated to wakf must not be alienated - Authority of Chief Executive Officer to file suit questioned - Revocation of powers and delegation under the Act evaluated. (Paras 13, 15, 33, 49, 70)

(B) Wakf Creation - Nature and characteristics of private wakf - Criteria for validity - Establishing title and authority over dedicated properties - The wakf not for exclusive family purposes, aimed at religious and charitable activities. (Paras 56, 62, 86)

Facts of the case:
The Golden Educational Trust claimed properties previously owned by the Mohd. Meeran Wakf. After a series of contested transactions initiated under dubious authority, the Trust contested other party's claims based on several sales and purchases.

Findings of Court:
The Wakf properties were ruled to be non- alienable as per the original wakf deed, thus affirming the wakf's integrity over the Trust's claim to ownership.

Issues: The main issues were whether the Chief Executive Officer possessed the authority to file the suit and the contendibility of undelegated powers when filing suit per the Wakf Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court asserted the validity of the wakf deed and confirmed that properties cannot be transferred as per the Act. The Chief Executive Officer was given authority under certain provisions to act for the Wakf Board.

Result: Revision petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction of cases and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. wakf creation and properties history. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. legal disputes and trials summary. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments from the revision petitioner. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. appellant's arguments in tr. a.s. no.222/2009. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. arguments from wakf board. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
7. court's analysis of arguments. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
8. legal context regarding wakf properties. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
9. conclusions drawn from evidence provided. (Para 49 , 50 , 51)
10. final ruling and dismissal of appeals. (Para 88)

JUDGMENT :

M. DHANDAPANI, J.

1. The revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.247/08 and CRP (MD) No. 1051/2017, have assailed the judgment and decree in O.S. No.128/2005 passed by the Wakf Tribunal/Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli, while the appeal in TR A.S. No.222/2009 has been filed by the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.247/2008 against the judgment and decree in O.S. No.159/2024 passed by the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

2. Since the facts and the relief sought for in all the revision petitions and the appeal are interconnected and the outcome of revision petitions determines the outcome of the appeal, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common judgment.

3. For the sake of convenience, the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No. 247/08, who is the appellant in Tr. A.S. No.222/09 will be referred to as ‘the Trust’ and the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.1051/17 will be referred to as ‘third party/revision petitioner’ and the 1st respondent in CRP (MD) No.247/08 will be referred to as ‘Wakf Board’.

4. The properties, which is the subject matter of the present lis is alleged to have been dedicated to a wakf, which has hitherto fore landed at the hands of the Trust and other private individuals upon alienation by the power agent of the Muthavalli, which is one of the group and it is also claimed to have been sold to the third party/revision petitioner, which has further been alienated as claimed by the other group. The entire facts revolve around the properties, which have been, according to the Wakf Board, dedicated for religious and charitable purposes and are intricately interconnected.

5. It transpires from the facts culled out by the trial court in CRP No.247/08 that the suit schedule properties originally belonged to one Mohd. Meeran, who is alleged to have created a wakf in and by which the properties, which have been specified in Schedule – 1 to the wakf deed were dedicated for the purpose of religious and charitable purposes as spelt out in Schedule – 2 to the wakf deed. The said Mohd. Meeran was the first Muthavalli of the wakf and hereditary succession of Muthavalli was provided for in the wakf deed and right to change the manner in which the Muthavalli is appointed was vested in the said Mohd. Meeran alone. The Wakf Deed also provided that the said properties, which have been dedicated to the wakf shall not be alienated by any means by the Muthavalli.

6. The Wakf Deed was executed as Document No.2279 on 4.9.1919. The first Muthavalli was Mohd. Meeran and after his life time, his daughter, Fathima Sugara Beevi took over as Muthavalli and she was administering the properties of the wakf. The said Fathima Sugara Beevi breathed her last on 26.10.1929 leaving behind her four daughters and on the basis of the recitals in the wakf deed dated 4.9.1919, the eldest daughter, Amathul Jaffer Fathima took over as Muthavalli of P.M.Mohd. Meeran Wakf. The wakf was surveyed by the Wakf Board and registered as G.S. No.718/9 WB and was published in the Government Gazette.

7. Amathul Jaffer Fathima was the last Muthavalli of the wakf, as due to her ailing health, she executed a registered power of attorney dated 3.2.1982 in favour of her son, Nazrudeen. A.J.Fathima, at the fag end of her life, was residing with her second

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top