BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
Golden Educational Trust Through its Trustee Sivakami Murugan W/o Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board Chennai, through its Chief Executive Officer – Respondent
C.R.P. (MD) NOS. 247 OF 2008 & 1051 OF 2017 AND TR. A.S. (MD) NO. 222 OF 2009 C.R.P. (MD) No.247 of 2008
Decided on : 04-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of cases and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. wakf creation and properties history. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. legal disputes and trials summary. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments from the revision petitioner. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. appellant's arguments in tr. a.s. no.222/2009. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. arguments from wakf board. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. court's analysis of arguments. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 8. legal context regarding wakf properties. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 9. conclusions drawn from evidence provided. (Para 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 10. final ruling and dismissal of appeals. (Para 88) |
JUDGMENT :
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
1. The revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.247/08 and CRP (MD) No. 1051/2017, have assailed the judgment and decree in O.S. No.128/2005 passed by the Wakf Tribunal/Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli, while the appeal in TR A.S. No.222/2009 has been filed by the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.247/2008 against the judgment and decree in O.S. No.159/2024 passed by the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.
2. Since the facts and the relief sought for in all the revision petitions and the appeal are interconnected and the outcome of revision petitions determines the outcome of the appeal, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common judgment.
3. For the sake of convenience, the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No. 247/08, who is the appellant in Tr. A.S. No.222/09 will be referred to as ‘the Trust’ and the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.1051/17 will be referred to as ‘third party/revision petitioner’ and the 1st respondent in CRP (MD) No.247/08 will be referred to as ‘Wakf Board’.
4. The properties, which is the subject matter of the present lis is alleged to have been dedicated to a wakf, which has hitherto fore landed at the hands of the Trust and other private individuals upon alienation by the power agent of the Muthavalli, which is one of the group and it is also claimed to have been sold to the third party/revision petitioner, which has further been alienated as claimed by the other group. The entire facts revolve around the properties, which have been, according to the Wakf Board, dedicated for religious and charitable purposes and are intricately interconnected.
5. It transpires from the facts culled out by the trial court in CRP No.247/08 that the suit schedule properties originally belonged to one Mohd. Meeran, who is alleged to have created a wakf in and by which the properties, which have been specified in Schedule – 1 to the wakf deed were dedicated for the purpose of religious and charitable purposes as spelt out in Schedule – 2 to the wakf deed. The said Mohd. Meeran was the first Muthavalli of the wakf and hereditary succession of Muthavalli was provided for in the wakf deed and right to change the manner in which the Muthavalli is appointed was vested in the said Mohd. Meeran alone. The Wakf Deed also provided that the said properties, which have been dedicated to the wakf shall not be alienated by any means by the Muthavalli.
6. The Wakf Deed was executed as Document No.2279 on 4.9.1919. The first Muthavalli was Mohd. Meeran and after his life time, his daughter, Fathima Sugara Beevi took over as Muthavalli and she was administering the properties of the wakf. The said Fathima Sugara Beevi breathed her last on 26.10.1929 leaving behind her four daughters and on the basis of the recitals in the wakf deed dated 4.9.1919, the eldest daughter, Amathul Jaffer Fathima took over as Muthavalli of P.M.Mohd. Meeran Wakf. The wakf was surveyed by the Wakf Board and registered as G.S. No.718/9 WB and was published in the Government Gazette.
7. Amathul Jaffer Fathima was the last Muthavalli of the wakf, as due to her ailing health, she executed a registered power of attorney dated 3.2.1982 in favour of her son, Nazrudeen. A.J.Fathima, at the fag end of her life, was residing with her second
M.A. Aziz – Vs – AP State Wakf Board & Anr.
Ali Akhtar Quadri – Vs – The State of Bihar
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board – Vs – Hathija Ammal
Nagoor Kaniammal – Vs – Tenkasi Vangaru Muthu Meeran Sahib
Madanuri Sri Rama Chandra Murthy – Vs – Syed Jalal
Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Ltd. – Vs – HDFC Bank Ltd.
The irreversibility of wakf property transactions based on the Wakf Act's provisions prohibits alienation, upholding the integrity of religious and charitable purposes over contested claims.
The Wakf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes regarding wakf properties, and the High Court should not interfere in such matters.
The court asserted that ownership disputes under the Wakf Act do not preclude valid claims from individuals claiming title, regardless of Wakf notifications, provided they can substantiate their owne....
(1) In a Revision Petition scope of consideration is limited and judgment/order under challenge can be interfered only in event of there being perversity seen on face of order and if conclusion reach....
The constitution of an inquiry commission by the State is valid despite challenges under the Waqf Act, 1995 when prior waqf declarations are arbitrary, devoid of proper procedure, and the property in....
Summary eviction under the A.P. Wakf Act is not permissible in the presence of bona fide disputes regarding property title, necessitating a full trial instead.
Wakf Tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to prior judgment in a civil suit settling the title, making the subsequent claims non-maintainable under Section 7(5) of the Wakf Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.