Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Golden Educational Trust Through its Trustee Sivakami Murugan W/o Murugan Residing at Sakthi Bavanam Door No.B-19, 5 th Main Road Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli – 11. – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board Chennai, through its Chief Executive Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of cases and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. wakf creation and properties history. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. legal disputes and trials summary. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments from the revision petitioner. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. appellant's arguments in tr. a.s. no.222/2009. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. arguments from wakf board. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. court's analysis of arguments. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 8. legal context regarding wakf properties. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 9. conclusions drawn from evidence provided. (Para 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 10. final ruling and dismissal of appeals. (Para 88) |
JUDGMENT :
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
1. The revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.247/08 and CRP (MD) No. 1051/2017, have assailed the judgment and decree in O.S. No.128/2005 passed by the Wakf Tribunal/Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli, while the appeal in TR A.S. No.222/2009 has been filed by the revision petitioner in CRP (MD) No.247/2008 against the judgment and decree in O.S. No.159/2024 passed by the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.
2. Since the facts and the relief sought for in all th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
