SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2915

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M, J.
The State of Kerala
Versus 
T.K.I. Ahamed Sherief, S/O. T.K.A.Ibrahim-  Respondent 
WA NO. 603 & 606 of 2025
Decided on : 10-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADV.SHRI K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP (AG) SHRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR, SPL.G.P.(REVENUE) SHRI.S.KANNAN, SENIOR G.P. SHRI.V.MANU, SPL. G.P. SHRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN SPL. G.P TO A.G
For the Respondent: SHRI.P.K.IBRAHIM SMT.K.P.AMBIKA SMT.ZEENATH P.K. SMT.JABEENA K.M.
SHRI.ANAZ BIN IBRAHIM SHRI.PRADEEP KUMAR A. SHRI JAMSHEED HAFIZ R4

The constitution of an inquiry commission by the State is valid despite challenges under the Waqf Act, 1995 when prior waqf declarations are arbitrary, devoid of proper procedure, and the property in question is deemed a gift deed, not waqf.

Headnote:(A) Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Waqf Act, 1995 - Inquiry Commission constituted under the COI Act to investigate the status of waqf property challenged - Single Bench quashed notification citing the statutory bar under Waqf Act - Court found inadequacy in the inquiry process, confirming State's power under Section 97, permitting it to address public interest regarding ownership rights. (Paras 1-6, 81-84)

(B) Waft Deed - Nature of endowment deed of 1950 evaluated - Court concluded it was a gift deed, not creating waqf as it lacked permanent dedication - Inaction and delay by Waqf Board over decades invalidated the declaration and upheld the State's authority to investigate interests of bona fide occupants. (Paras 29-42, 49-73)

(C) Locus Standi - Original Writ Petitioners held to lack standing as aggrieved parties, as they did not demonstrate direct impact from the inquiry commission - Writ jurisdiction confirmed applicable to examine the legality of waqf declarations irrespective of alternative remedies available. (Paras 25, 87)

JUDGMENT :

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, J.

The writ appeals at hand take exception to the final judgment dated 17.03.2025 passed by the Single Bench of this Court in batch of writ petitions, with the lead one being WP(C) No. 2839/2025 and other connected matters. Vide the impugned judgment, the learned Single Bench through reasoned findings quashed the notification dated 27.11.2024 issued under the provisions of Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (for short,the COI Act), constituting an Inquiry Commission headed by a former Judge of this Court to inquire into certain issues mentioned there under relating to property situated in Survey No. 18/1 of the Vadakkekara village (hereinafter called ‘the subject property’), Kozhikode district. The learned Single Bench held that since the subject property has been declared as a waqf property by the Kerala Waqf Board (for short, KWB), therefore in view of the specific statutory bar under the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995 (for short, ‘Act of 1995’), specifically Section 83(1), the Inquiry Commission (for short, ‘IC’) under the COI Act could not have been constituted at the threshold for carrying out any inquiry touching the nature of the said waqf property. Since the IC inevitably would be delving into the contours of the endowment deed through which the said property was gifted to R5, Farooq College Management Committee (for short, ‘R5 Farooq Management’), therefore the State Government has acted ultra vires its powers available in the province of COI Act and acted contrary to provisions of Waqf Act, 1995.

2. The learned Single Bench also held that since the issue is already pending consideration before the Waqf Tribunal, Kozhikode, which is sought to be inquired into by the IC, recourse to the provisions of COI Act by the State Government was still born and could not have been ever resorted to. The IC has been appointed without any application of mind, which resultantly fails the test of law and consequentially quashed the impugned notification dated 27.11.2024 (Exhibit P1 before the Writ Court).

3. For the elaborate reasons and detailed findings to follow, we express our inability to agree with the findings of the learned single Judge, which in our opinion are ex facie erroneous, having been passed in ignorance of Mussalman Waqf Act, 1923, Waqf Act, 1954, Waqf Act, 1995 as also the pronouncements of the Supreme Court from time to time.

4. We shall be holding that the notification dated 25.09.2019 notifying the subject property as waqf is ultra vires the provisions of The Waqf Act, 1954, as also The Central Waqf Act, 1995 and nothing less than a land grabbing tactics of KWB which has affected the bread and butter, livelihood of hundreds of families and bonafide occupants who had purchased tranches of land decades prior to the notification of the waqf property. Whilst affirming the validity of Exhibit P1 notification constituting the IC, we shall also be holding that the State Government is not bound by the waqf declaration/ registration effected by KWB, being simply an eye wash to paint the subject property as a waqf property and Govt. possess widely conferred statutory powers to issue directions under Section 97 of the Waqf Act, 1995 post the conclusion of and submission of the report by the IC under challenge.

A. NECESSARY AND ADMITTED FACTS-

5. The facts adumbrated herein briefly have been borrowed both from the pleadings before the Single Bench as well as before this Court. An extent of 404.76 Acres of property comprised in old Survey No. 18 of then Vadakkekara Village of erstwhile Travancore State was transferred to R5 Farooq Management vide Document No.2115/1950 through an endowment deed, executed on 01.11.1950 by Mohammed Siddique Sait also titled as ‘waqf endowment’. The aforesaid land originally measuring around 404.76 Acres was originally unregistered government land, which was assigned in favour of Shri. Abdul Sathar Haji Moosa Sait by the erstwhile Travancore Cochin Government

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top