BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.SRIMATHY, J.
Vellaisamy - Petitioner
Vs.
The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy - Respondent
W.P.(Crl.)(MD)No.2699 and 2744 of 2026 and WPMP (Crl.) (MD) No.665 of 2026
Decided On : 06-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. temple festival permission sought. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no caste-based discrimination permitted. (Para 3) |
| 3. inclusive festival conduct directed. (Para 4) |
ORDER :
S.SRIMATHY, J.
The writ petition in W.P.(Crl.)(MD) No.2699 of 2026 is filed seeking a direction to the official respondents to grant permission and police protection to conduct a temple festival from 05.05.2026 to 09.05.2026. The writ petition in W.P.(Crl.)(MD) No.2744 of 2026 is filed to consider the representation dated 01.05.2026 for taking necessary action against respondents 5 to 16 and others for their illegal and high- handed acts in the nature of ostracization of the petitioner and others from society, besides conducting the Chithirai Temple festival of Arulmigu Sri Madurai Veeran Swami, Sri Pattavan Swami, Sri Thekkamalayan Swami, and Sri Karuppasamy Temple, Aniyappur Village, Vaiyampatti Union, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.
2. The said festival is celebrated for five days. The contention of the petitioner, namely Annadurai, is that the private respondents are restraining them from participating in the temple festival. In the earlier round of litigation, in W.P.(Crl.)(MD) No.2230 of 2026, this Court, vide order dated 21.04.2026, granted permission to conduct the festival along with Annadurai and others. The contention of the petitioner Annadurai is that, in spite of such order, the same was flouted.
3. Now, another petitioner, Vellaisamy, has also filed a writ petition in W.P.(Crl.)(MD) No.2699 of 2026, wherein he is also seeking permission and police protection to conduct the temple festival. Therefore, if the festival is conducted by including Annadurai and others, permission shall be granted. There cannot be any discrimination on the basis of caste or any other reason.
4. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the festival committee to collect the temple vari from all persons and conduct the festival in an inclusive manner. In case there is any discrimination or if the orders of the Court are not complied with or are flouted, severe action will be taken against persons flouting the orders. The police shall ensure law and order and also ensure that the above order is implemented in letter and spirit.
5. With the above directions, these writ petitions stand disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
Court mandates inclusive participation in temple festivals prohibiting caste-based discrimination.
The court emphasizes the need for police protection during religious festivals while recognizing the rights of multiple parties to celebrate.
The Court may grant permission for religious festivals despite pending rival claims by allowing participation for prayer purposes while relegating the determination of ultimate control to independent....
The fundamental right to worship is not restricted to one temple, allowing groups to worship in different temples without coercion.
Temple administration disputes resolved via civil suit; writ court directs peace committee for peaceful festival with police protection.
Temple management disputes referred to civil court; worship open to all communities pending adjudication.
Court permits joint temple festival participation and quashes denial order upon parties' consent, imposing conditions for harmony.
The court determined that police protection for a temple festival cannot be granted due to a pending civil suit over the temple's administration, yet allowed the festival to proceed under cooperative....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.