SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
Tvl. KPK Fuel Services – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer, Krishnagiri – Respondent
WP No. 17421 of 2026, WMP Nos. 18680, 18682 of 2026
Decided On : 02-06-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Raghunandan Sriram
For the Respondent: Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran

Late fees are applicable to any failure to furnish a return by the due date. Where no specific penalty is prescribed for a contravention, the residuary penalty provision applies to ensure statutory compliance.

Headnote:(A) Tax Legislation - Section 47(2) - Section 125 - Failure to file annual return - Imposition of late fee and penalty - Whether late fee is leviable for non-filing - Held, statute explicitly provides for late fee upon failure to furnish return by due date - Whether penalty provision in the residuary section is applicable - Held, where no separate penalty is prescribed for a contravention, the residuary penalty provision applies - Impugned penalty and late fee are maintained. (Paras 4-7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an order imposing a late fee and penalty for the failure to submit an annual return for a specific financial year. It was argued that the limitation period for filing had already expired and that late fees were legally applicable only for belated filings rather than total non-filings. Additionally, it was contended that the penalty imposed was not supported by the governing legislation.

Findings of Court:
The court clarified that the statutory framework prescribes a late fee for a registered person who fails to furnish a return by the mandated due date. The court further analyzed the penalty mechanism and determined that since the governing statute does not delineate a specific penalty for the failure to file an annual return, the general residual penalty provision is appropriately invoked.

Issues: The central issues addressed were whether a late fee is leviable for the non-filing of a return and whether a penalty can be imposed in the absence of a specific penalty provision for that particular failure.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the statutory language unequivocally authorizes the levy of a late fee for the failure to submit returns, and the residuary penalty provision serves to address statutory contraventions where no specific penalty has otherwise been identified.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. initiation of writ challenge against administrative tax penalty. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner contention on filing timelines and penalty application. (Para 3 , 6)
3. statutory interpretation of late fee liability under section 47(2). (Para 4 , 5)
4. dismissal of petition due to statutory compliance of penalty. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

1. An order dated 13.12.2023 imposing a late fee and penalty on the petitioner for failure to file the annual return in Form GSTR-9 is the subject of the challenge in this writ petition.

2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the time limit for filing an annual return for a financial year is three years from the due date of furnishing said annual return. As regards the Assessment Year 2017-2018, he submits that a notification was issued fixing the due date of 05.02.2026. Reckoning the three-year period therefrom, he submits that the three year period lapsed in February 2023. Adverting to the impugned order, learned counsel contends that it erroneously records that the taxpayer filed the return on 07.12.2022. He adds that a late fee may be levied only in respect of belated filing of a return, but not in respect of non-filing thereof.

4. Sub-Section (2) of Section 47 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, governs the issue. The said provision is set out below:

Section 47 Levy of Late Fee.

(1) ……..

(2) Any registered person who fails to furnish the return required under Section 44 by the due date shall be liable to pay a late fee of one hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of an amount calculated at a quarter per cent. Of his turnover in the State or Union Territory.”

5. From the text of Sub-Section (2), it is evident that late fees is leviable on a registered person who fails to file the return by the due date. The said late fee is leviable at Rs.100 per day of default, subject to the maximum of not more than 0.25% of the turnover.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner also contends that the penalty under Section 125 of applicable GST enactments cannot be imposed after levying a late fee. Section 125 enables the imposition of penalty of up to Rs.25,000/- for contravention of any provisions of the applicable GST statutes or rules framed thereunder, provided no separate penalty is prescribed under the statute in respect thereof. On perusal of applicable statutes, no separate penalty is prescribed in respect of failure to file the annual return. Hence, the imposition of penalty is in order.

7. Thus, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is untenable and Section 47(2) enables the levy of late fee, if a taxpayer fails to file the return. In view thereof, there is no infirmity in the impugned order warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

8. For the reasons aforesaid, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top