SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1177

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K.SURENDER, JJ. 
V.Selvi - Petitioners 
Versus 
The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By The Secretary to Government Home Department – Respondent
WP No. 20372 of 2024 
Decided On : 28-04-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mrs.V.S.Manimegalai
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Arunkumar Additional Government Pleader, Mr.M.Babu Muthu Meeran, Additional Public Prosecutor

Mandamus issued for water body encroachment removal; authorities liable for dereliction, disciplinary action mandated.

Headnote:Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007, petitioners complained about encroachments on water channel from Chembarambakkam Lake. Court found authorities colluded with encroachers, failed to act despite complaints, leading to assaults on petitioners and improper police handling. Court directed eviction and enquiry into lapses. Issues framed on removal of encroachments, police investigation into assaults under IPC Sections 354, 323 etc., and official negligence. Ratio holds authorities must protect water bodies per Supreme Court directives; inaction causes flooding and justifies disciplinary action. Writ petition disposed directing removal of encroachments within six weeks, departmental proceedings against negligent officials within three months, and final police reports within three months.

Table of Content
1. encroachments on water channel and official inaction despite complaints. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. serious allegations of authority collusion with encroachers. (Para 8 , 10)
3. police reinvestigation and final reports directed in criminal cases. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. dereliction mandates eviction, enquiry, and disciplinary proceedings. (Para 14)

Order :

S.M.Subramaniam J.

Writ of mandamus has been instituted directing removal of all encroachments on the water channel emanating from Chembarambakkam Lake and passing through No 61-Malaiyambakkam Village, No 65-Kollaichery Village, No.87-Muntram Kattai Village, No.83-Thandalam Village, No 81- Tharapakkam Village and converging in the Adyar River at Manimedu in Tharapakkam Village and direct initiation of action against the encroachers and the colluding officials. The second relief sought for in the writ petition is to direct the Commissioner of Police Tambaram to enquire into the allegations against respondents 9, 10 and other officials based upon the representation submitted by petitioners 2 and 3 on 30.11.2023.

2. Petitioners, as a family are residing in Mariamman Koil Street, Thandalam Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Petitioners have given a complaint to the competent authority for removal of encroachment from water body on 28.06.2023. Since complaint was given for removal of encroachment in a water body, few encroachers have taken personal vengeance against the family members of the petitioners. On 26.10.2023, when 2nd and 3rd petitioners were proceeding to Vel’s University in a scooter, they were intercepted and manhandled by Venu, S/o.Seethapathi, Wilson, S/o.Venu, Murugan, S/o.Seethapathy, their relatives Gowthaman and Anu, W/o.Venu, at the instigation of the Village Administrative Officer, Thandalam Village Panchayat and K.Arasu/President, Thandalam Village Panchayat as well as Bakyalakshmi, W/o.Thangam, Ward member. Citing the names of these persons who have manhandled the 2nd petitioner (brother of the 3rd petitioner) and 3rd petitioner (college student), a police complaint was lodged.

3. The complaint given by the petitioners, was not investigated properly. Contrarily, the alleged accused persons were called, and concerned police authority insisted the petitioners’ family to withdraw the complaint, failing which, they will face serious consequences.

4. In Paragraph No.18 of the writ affidavit, it is stated that 3rd petitioner is a law student. To terrorise the family members of the 2nd and 3rd petitioners, they were attacked. A representation dated 30.11.2023 was addressed to the Commissioner of Police, disclosing the commission of offences, including the offence against women affecting the modesty of women under Section 354 IPC (under Section 74 of BNS). It appears that Sub-Inspector of Police made an attempt to close the case, and there is no further action at the end of the Commissioner of Police. It is further stated that Village Administrative Officer, President, Thandalam Village Panchayat and Inspector of Police have visited the property of the petitioners’ family, removed coconut trees and diverted the water channels into the property of the petitioners. It is submitted that Village Administrative Officer, Thandalam Village Panchayat allegedly insisted other persons to commit the offence. Police authorities and Panchayat Authorities have colluded with the land grabbers, and acted not only in violation of the law, but also made an attempt to protect the alleged land grabbers and encroachers in water body.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that all these land grabbers have encroached upon the water body, and instead of removing the encroachments from the water body, officials colluded and protected the encroachers in the water body.

6. Pertinently, one Mrs.M.Malarvizhi, Tahsildar, Kundrathur addressed a letter to the learned Government Pleader vide Na.Ka.No.2033/2024/Aa1, dated 25.09.2024 stating that survey will be c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top