Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Mahindra World City Developers Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Rep by its, The Sub-Inspector of Police, DCB, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution case of forged chain of title documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's bona fide purchase and post-death settlement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. prosecution evidence and compromise confirmation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. verification of voluntary settlement with alternate land. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. quashing proceedings per supreme court guidelines. (Para 14) |
ORDER :
M. Nirmal Kumar, J.
The petitioner/A9 in C.C.No.251 of 2020 facing trial for offence under Sections 120(b), 465, 468 & 471 IPC before the learned learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpet (trial Court), filed this Criminal Original Petition.
2.Since the defacto complainant Raji died on 17.09.2019, his legal heirs filed impleading petition in Crl.M.P.No.7429 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.No.8954 of 2026 to implead themselves as R2 to R8. Accordingly, the same is ordered.
3.Case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant Raji, S/o.Kanthappa Naicker lodged a complaint on 10.10.2013 and case in Crime No.83 of 2013 registered. The complaint is that the defacto complainant inherited the property situated at Veerapuram, Madura Malaiyampakkam. This property devolved from defacto complainant’s forefathers and
Quashing non-compoundable forgery proceedings permissible post-family settlement under Section 482 CrPC per Supreme Court guidelines.
High Court can quash non-compoundable offence proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if parties settle dispute amicably and no public interest involved.
An FIR disclosing prima facie cognizable offences, such as forgery and criminal conspiracy, should not be quashed at the threshold stage under Section 482 CrPC solely because of a parallel civil suit....
The court affirmed the trial Judge's decision to return original sale deed documents to purported bona fide purchasers, ruling the de-facto complainant lacked established title over the property.
Duplicate criminal proceedings for the same allegations are not permitted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court cannot quash FIRs based on allegations of criminal offenses without detailed investigation, especially when the ingredients of the o....
Civil disputes over property sale proceeds cannot be criminally prosecuted without ingredients of offence; quashed due to delay and civil nature.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
