Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL
K.S.Damodaran, S/o Late K.S Shanmugasundaram Nadar – Appellant
Versus
K.S.Damodaran, S/o Late K.S Shanmugasundaram Nadar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property ownership via will and mou payments (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claims against award validity (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defendant's bona fide purchaser defense (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. failure to prove mou and clean hands (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. insufficient evidence dismisses suit (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
P. Dhanabal, J.
1.This Civil Suit has been filed by the plaintiff for the relief of declaration to declare that the impugned Award passed by the 17th defendant in favour of 16th defendant in A.R.B.No.1 of 2014, dated 15.04.2001, is illegal, void-ab- initio and un-enforceable, and also for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the 16th defendant from in any manner taking steps to enforce the impugned Award, dated 15.04.2021 passed by the 17th defendant in favour of the 16th defendant and for costs of the suit.
2.The gist of the plaint averments, are as follows:
2.1. The suit property originally belonged to one Kasimari Shanmugha Sundara Nadar and he purchased the property through two different sale deeds, dated 11.03.1957 and 13.01.1959 respectively. The first defendant is the son of the said Late K.S.Shanmugasundara Nadar and the father of the first defe
Even in ex-parte suits, plaintiffs must prove claims with cogent evidence including originals; unexplained 29-year delay without specific performance, unclean hands disentitle declaration against arb....
The appellate court determined that the First Appellate Court erred in not properly evaluating the ownership evidence, resulting in incorrect distribution of property rights and affirming the Plainti....
The court emphasized the importance of proper service of summons and the legal consequences of a failed specific performance suit in determining possession rights.
Absence of the buyer's signature invalidates a sale agreement, requiring proof of the parties' intentions; the suit for specific performance is timely if filed within limitation after notice of refus....
The court ruled that statutory rights of a bona fide purchaser prevail over equitable rights of an agreement holder in cases of specific performance, particularly in the absence of evidence proving r....
Registered partition deed between brothers under Mohammedan law creates valid title; High Court cannot re-appreciate facts absent substantial question of law in second appeal.
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the genuineness of the sale agreement, thus denying the relief of specific performance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
