Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.MANJULA
Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
Valarmathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the plaintiff's case. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. defendants' positions and claims regarding the property. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on the status and validity of agreements. (Para 10 , 14 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. substantial legal questions and limitations on claims. (Para 11 , 24 , 25 , 29) |
| 5. dismissal of appeals and confirmation of lower court judgments. (Para 30) |
JUDGMENT :
These Second Appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and decree passed in A.S.Nos.23 & 29 of 2006 dated 15.07.2009.
3. Aggrieved over that, the plaintiff in O.S.No.350 of 2004 preferred two appeals in A.S.Nos.23 &29 of 2006 before the first appellate Court. Those appeals have also been dismissed by a common judgment dated 15.07.2009. Hence, the present second appeals have been filed challenging the said judgment and decree of the first appellate Court.
The suit ‘A’ schedule property now belongs to the plaintiff and her husband, Natarajan, and they are in possession and enjoyment of the same. The property was acquired by them from the 2nd defendant under a registered sale deed dated 01.03.1995. The suit property originally belonged to the plaintiff’s husband, Natarajan, who
Absence of the buyer's signature invalidates a sale agreement, requiring proof of the parties' intentions; the suit for specific performance is timely if filed within limitation after notice of refus....
An agreement of sale signed by vendor alone and delivered to purchaser, and accepted by the purchaser, has always been considered to be a valid contract. In the event of breach by the vendor, it can ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a party seeking specific performance to prove the execution of the sale agreement and demonstrate readiness and willingness ....
The plaintiff's failure to prove the execution of the sale agreement and her readiness and willingness for specific performance, along with the defendant's established possession and enjoyment of the....
In a suit for specific performance, the Plaintiff must prove the genuineness of the agreement and his readiness to perform, failing which the suit must be dismissed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the agreement dated 04.04.1996 was valid and enforceable, and the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform the contract. The court also foun....
Point of law: Absence of any material, that the plaintiff had exercised undue influence in obtaining the sale agreement from the defendant at the time of the alleged loan transaction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
