Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR
Meenachi – Appellant
Versus
Rajalekshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of suit for partition and injunction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial, appeal procedures and issues framed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. rejection of additional evidence application. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. nature of suit properties under inheritance. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. admissibility of unregistered family arrangement deed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. effect of sale deed and impleadment; decision. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT :
K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.
1.The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.74 of 2014, dated 01.04.2019, on the file of the Principal District Court, Kanniyakumari District at Nagercoil, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.74 of 2007, dated 19.07.2010, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil.
2. The appellants are the plaintiffs and they filed a suit in O.S.NO.74 of 2007, before the Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, claiming partition and allotment of 3/12 shares in the suit properties and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from aleinating or encumbering the suit properties.
3. For the sake of c
Existence of an unregistered family arrangement deed does not confer partition rights absent proper registration and stamp duty where required by law.
If the parties have reduced the family agreement into writing with an intention of using that writing as an evidence of what they have negotiated and when the arrangement is brought on by the documen....
An unregistered document that creates or extinguishes rights in immovable property for the first time requires mandatory registration. If such a document is the sole basis of a suit and lacks registr....
Family settlements are binding and enforceable even if not registered; parties must challenge prior arrangements within limitation periods to maintain claims.
The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to establish that the properties are ancestral, and evidence must be pleaded and proved through evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compulsory registration of family settlement documents under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908, and the inadmissib....
The court reaffirmed that for a valid partition among joint family properties, proper registration and absence of fraud are crucial, emphasizing joint possession and familial rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
