SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ.
The State Rep. by Inspector of Police - Appellant
Vs.
Manuvel @ Manuvel Amalraj - Respondent
Crl.A.No.518 of 2019
Decided On : 27-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Ms.M.Arifa Thasneem
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Sankarasubbu

Mere expression of opposition to government policies does not establish an offence under Section 124A IPC in absence of incitement to violence or illegal actions.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 124A - Offence of sedition - The criminal appeal was filed to challenge the acquittal of the accused for allegedly instigating violence against the government regarding the declaration of theTiger Reserve. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused organized armed rebellion or incited violence against the Government as witnesses turned hostile, and the film shown in public domain remained unbanned. (Paras 11-19)

(B) The trial court extended the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused, asserting that mere expression of opposition to governmental policy does not equate to criminal offence under Sections 124A and 505 IPC if no incitement to violence is proved. (Paras 12-14)

Facts of the case:
The accused was alleged to have instigated villagers against the government regarding a Tiger Reserve proposal, claiming it would harm their livelihood. Evidence presented was primarily from official witnesses, some of whom did not support the case. (Paras 2-6)

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the prosecution did not substantiate allegations with credible evidence, leading to a proper acquittal.

Issues: Whether the expressed opposition to government policy amounted to sedition and the adequacy of evidence presented by the prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi: A mere expression of concern about government policies by the accused does not constitute sedition unless it is connected to actual violence or incitement, for which no evidence was provided.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. facts regarding the prosecution's case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments presented by the appellant. (Para 8)
3. contentions by the respondent. (Para 9)
4. court's observations and reasoning. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. final conclusion and order of the court. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the State to set aside the judgment of acquittal of the respondent/accused namely Manuvel Amalraj in Sessions Case No.84 of 2015 dated 30.01.2019 by the Assistant Sessions Court (Sub Court), Sathiyamangalam, Erode District and convict the respondent/accused for the charges framed against him.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.06.2013 at 2.00 p.m., the Hasanur Special Sub Inspector (P.W.6), gave a special report to the Inspector of Police, Thalavadi Police Station, stating that today (11.06.2013) at about 12.00 p.m., when he visited the Neithalapuram Bus Stop along with Head Constable-2253 (P.W.7) and Constable-2541 (P.W.4) of Thalavadi Police Station, they noticed the accused/respondent herein was speaking against the Government of India stating that the Government of India has announced the setting up a Fourth Tiger Sanctuary in Tamil Nadu’s Sathiyamangalam Forest and based on which, the Tamil Nadu Government has issued an order. The accused instigated that if the Sathiyamangalam Forest is announced as a Tiger Sanctuary, people cannot live there. The hill tribes and villagers who live there will be removed by the Government and they cannot enter the forest even to collect fire wood, graze cows etc. Even if people are permitted to reside nearby, schools, hospitals, water connections and other Government welfare measures will not be provided to the people. The Indian Government has to withdraw the orders of Tiger Sanctuary that have been announced against the public and law. Against the orders that destroys agriculture and takes away the rights of the State Government, the Tamil Nadu Government has to pass a resolution in the assembly. Further, the accused instigated the people by stating that you should fight against Government for your livelihood. Moreover, to create confusion and riot among the people, he had spread false propaganda against the Government, disrespecting the Government policies and orders, by showing gestures among the people of Neithalapuram, thereby attempting to bring disbelief and disrespect towards the Government.

3. Based on the report submitted by the Special Sub Inspector of Police, a case in Crime No.21 of 2013 was registered by Hasanur Police against the accused/respondent for the offence under Section 124(A) of IPC. Subsequently, 'Q' Branch CID of the State Government took up the matter for its effective investigation, on the strength of the appropriate orders of the department. After completion of thorough investigation, got sanction accorded from the appropriate authority (P.W.27) and they filed 2 charge sheets before the Judicial Magistrate, Sathiyamangalam, for the offences under Sections 124(A) and 505 IPC, alleging that the accused visited some of the witnesses in Sathyamangalam on various dates and canvassed people stating that the people and working class of Thalavaid, Hasanur and Neithalapuram should be given awareness as to how the Central and State Governments are cheating the people in the name of Tiger Reserve; He further canvassed that the Central and State Governments are helping the capitalists to exploit the working class and the tribal people and therefore, the people should overthrow the Central and State Governments that are working in favour of the capitalist through armed revolution; Further, the accused claimed himself to be a member of C.P.I., (Moist) and trained in Arms and bomb making and instigated the people to protest against the Central and State Governments by armed revolution stating that he is ready to give Arms training; and thereby, the accused attempted to bring hatred and enmity towards t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top