Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
V. Ramakrishnan S/o V. Sengama Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Kulasekhar S/o Late Ramachandra Naidu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 18) |
| 2. claims regarding the koorchit and property transfers. (Para 3 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. joint family property distribution under hindu law. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. settlement deeds and their legal validity. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 5. injunctions and final orders. (Para 34 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
1. The appellant is the third defendant in the suit. He assails the judgment and decree of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur at Ponneri, in O.S. No. 34 of 2010 dated 18.01.2021.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.
3. The plaintiffs 1 to 3 and defendants 1 and 2 are the children of one late Ramachandra Naidu. The 5th defendant is the daughter of the first defendant, the granddaughter of Ramachandra Naidu. She was arrayed as a party, as the first defendant had executed a settlement deed in her favour. The 4th plaintiff and the 3rd defendant are the purchasers of the suit schedule property from the plaintiffs, and the fifth defendant, respectively.
4. The case of the plaintiffs is that there existed a coparcenary between Ramac
A daughter is a coparcener by birth under Hindu law, gaining equal property rights regardless of her father's status, establishing a foundation for equal partition claims.
A Karta under Mitakshara law cannot alienate joint family property via a Will; it is a family arrangement. Possession under a void document can lead to adverse possession if maintained for the requis....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of property rights based on the source of purchase and the validity of settlement deeds executed within a family.
Gift by a coparcener of his undivided interest in coparcenery properties as void - Coparcener can make a gift of his undivided interest in coparcener property to another coparcener or to a stranger....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the validity of settlement and sale deeds, the nature of the suit property, and the right of pre-emptive purchase.
Children born to a void marriage are entitled to property shares under the Hindu Marriage Act, despite the marriage's invalidity.
The court established the principle that under the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 1/1990, a daughter is entitled to her share in ancestral property, and any disposition or alienation without her consent is....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
