Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR
Banumathy – Appellant
Versus
R.Lakshmi Kutty (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition lawsuit details and relationships among parties. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. disputed legitimacy of plaintiffs based on marriage status. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. implications of void marriage on inheritance rights. (Para 14 , 16 , 20) |
| 4. final ruling on the share distribution of plaintiffs. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
The unsuccessful defendants 7 and 9 are the appellants herein.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the suit.
5. It was the case of the plaintiffs that the 1st plaintiff-R.Lakshmi Kutty got married to 1st defendant in the year 1950 as his second wife. After marriage, the 1st plaintiff joined 1st defendant and lived in matrimonial house in Namakkal. During October-1951, the 1st plaintiff got employment as Maternity Assistant in Municipal Hospital in Rasipuram. During weekends and holidays, the 1st plaintiff would go over to Namakkal and reside with defendants 1 and 2. The 1st plaintiff handed over her entire savings and salary to her husband-1st defendant. The 2nd plaintiff acquired B.Sc., degree and also passed Higher Grade in English and Tamil Typewriting. At the instance of 1st defendant, he discontinued his
Children born to a void marriage are entitled to property shares under the Hindu Marriage Act, despite the marriage's invalidity.
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a child born out of a void marriage is not entitled to claim partition of the joint family properties during the lifetime of the parent but ma....
Daughters have equal rights as coparceners in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, affecting share distribution in partition cases.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
Registered partition deeds take precedence over claims of oral partition, limiting the rights of heirs under the amended Hindu Succession Act to those alive or affected at the time of partition.
Daughters have equal rights and shares in ancestral joint family properties under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
