SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 2190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR
G.Karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
Pappayee – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.E.K.Kumaresan

JUDGMENT :

K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.

The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.120 of 2010 dated 20.03.2025 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Karur, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.521 of 2008 dated 26.10.2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur.

2. The appellant is the plaintiff. He originally filed a suit claiming permanent injunction restraining the first respondent / original defendant and her men from in any manner interfering with the appellant / plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Pending suit, he amended the plaint and claimed the reliefs of declaration that the suit property is belonging to him and for recovery of possession.

3. The first respondents / original defendant filed her written statement and contested the suit.

4. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as per their status / ranking in the trial Court.

5. The learned Principal District Munsif, Karur, after framing necessary issues and after full trial, passed a judgment and decree dated 26.10.2010 dismissing the suit. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top