SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 560

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.MURALI SHANKAR
K.Vijayana – Appellant
Versus
G. Gunasekaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar

Table of Content
1. nature of the appeal and case origin. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. limitations of high court's jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. claim of ownership and adverse possession. (Para 7 , 8)
4. admission of ownership by defendants. (Para 9 , 10)
5. co-ownership and legal standing for claims. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
6. evidence and inferences drawn by appellate court. (Para 15 , 16)
7. conclusion on substantial questions of law. (Para 17)
8. final judgment. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT :

K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.

The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.68 of 2024, dated 31.07.2025, on the file of IV Additional District Court, Madurai, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.494 of 2017, dated 02.02.2024, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thirumangalam.

2. The appellants are the defendants. The respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.494 of 2017, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thirumangalam claiming the relief of recovery of possession and for permanent injunction in respect of the suit properties.

3. Originally, the sole defendant filed a counter claim cum written statement and contested the suit. Pending suit, the sole defendant died and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top