SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Ori) 8

P.V.B.RAO, S.BARMAN
NETRAMANI DEBI – Appellant
Versus
LAKHMINARAYAN KAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.PAL, G.K.Mishra

RAO, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF files this appeal against the confirming judgment of Sri T. V. Rao, additional District Judge of Puri dismissing her suit for a declaration that the adoption of defendant No. 1 was not true and valid.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-appellant Netramani Debi and defendant No. 3 Suryamani Devi are the daughters of Taluchha Brundaban Mohapatro and his wife is defendant No. 2 lakshmi Dibya. Brundaban was the sebayat of the temple of Shri Jagannath of Puri and he died on 3-9-43. Lakhmi Dibya succeeded to his properties and according to the plaintiffs case, defendant No. 1 Lakshminarayan Kar, natural son of Lokenath kar, had been set up as the adopted son of the deceased Brundaban Mohapatra by obtaining a fraudulent deed of adoption from the widow of Brundaban on 29-9-43 and registered on 3-11-43 by Lokenath Kar. Two sale deeds were executed by the widow in respect of her husband's property in favour of her daughters, the plaintiff and defendant No. 3, on 29-9-43 for discharging loans incurred for the Sudhi expenses of her husband, but in these documents also she was fraudulently described as the mother guardian of defendant No. 1 who was described as the adopted son of Bru


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top