P.V.B.RAO, S.BARMAN
NETRAMANI DEBI – Appellant
Versus
LAKHMINARAYAN KAR – Respondent
RAO, J.
( 1 ) PLAINTIFF files this appeal against the confirming judgment of Sri T. V. Rao, additional District Judge of Puri dismissing her suit for a declaration that the adoption of defendant No. 1 was not true and valid.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff-appellant Netramani Debi and defendant No. 3 Suryamani Devi are the daughters of Taluchha Brundaban Mohapatro and his wife is defendant No. 2 lakshmi Dibya. Brundaban was the sebayat of the temple of Shri Jagannath of Puri and he died on 3-9-43. Lakhmi Dibya succeeded to his properties and according to the plaintiffs case, defendant No. 1 Lakshminarayan Kar, natural son of Lokenath kar, had been set up as the adopted son of the deceased Brundaban Mohapatra by obtaining a fraudulent deed of adoption from the widow of Brundaban on 29-9-43 and registered on 3-11-43 by Lokenath Kar. Two sale deeds were executed by the widow in respect of her husband's property in favour of her daughters, the plaintiff and defendant No. 3, on 29-9-43 for discharging loans incurred for the Sudhi expenses of her husband, but in these documents also she was fraudulently described as the mother guardian of defendant No. 1 who was described as the adopted son of Bru
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.