SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ori) 47

R.L.NARASIMHAM
RAMCHANDRA NAHAKA – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT RANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.RATH, R.C.MISRA

R. L. NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the Judgment of the Additional Subordinate Judge of berhampur, dismissing an appeal filed against the judgment of the Munsif of berhampur, in an execution case, allowing the objection of the judgment debtor to the attachment of his residential house in view of the provisions of Clauses (b) and (c) of Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code. The judgment debtor claimed to be an 'agriculturist and hence he sought for exemption under the said clauses of the civil Procedure Code.

( 2 ) THE sole point of law taken by Mr. Misra for the appellant is that the objection of the judgment debtor under Clauses (b) and (c) of Section 60, C. P. C. is barred by res judicata. A scrutiny of the records of Execution Case No. (E. P 7 of 1960) shows that on 15-3-62 the judgment debtor filed a petition describing it as one under section 47 read with Section 151, C. P. C. and objecting to the attachment and sale of the property on the ground that he was an agriculturist and that consequently Clauses (b) and (c) of Section 60, C. P. C. would be attracted. The executing Court registered a miscellaneous case (M. C. No. 60/1962) and issued notice to the d






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top