SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Ori) 106

A.MISRA
SUDHA DIBYA – Appellant
Versus
SWAPNESWAR DEB – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.MOHANTY, J.RATH

A. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANT is the appellant.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS filed the suit for removal of the defendant from the shebait marfatdarship of plaintiff No. 1, the deity, and appointing plaintiff No. 2 to perform its seba-puja from out of the usufructs of the, suit schedule properties. According to them, Bhima Das, father-in-law of the defendant purchased some of the deity's properties from the father of plaintiff No. 2 and since then he as a co-marfatdar was performing his turn of seba-puja of the deity. After Bhima's death, his son dol-govind was also performing the seba-puja of the deity along with other shebaits from out of the usufructs of the suit lands. Dolgovind died leaving his widow (defendant) as his sole heir and successor. Since 1960, the defendant who is serving at Bhanjanagar as a female Jail warder has not been performing the seba-puja of the deity and misappropriating the income. On these grounds, the deity and its mar-fatdar (plaintiff No. 2) filed the suit for the above reliefs.

( 3 ) DEFENDANT resisted the suit pleading that she has been performing the sebapuja regularly in accordance with the usual custom; that plaintiff No. 2 has no right to institute the su















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top