J.M.MAHAPATRA, S.C.MOHAPATRA
LAND ACQUISITION ZONE OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
DAMBERUDHAR PRADHAN – Respondent
S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal u/s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on behalf of the State Government. No cross-objection has been filed by claimants.
( 2 ) ON basis of notification u/ S. 4 (1) of the Act published in the year 1984, land of different categories in various villages of various owners were acquired for Sambalpur-Talchar Rail Link. Two acres 44 decimals of cultivable agricultural land belonging to the claimants in village Badsar were acquired compulsorily. In near past, land in the nearby villages were acquired for National Alluminium Company. Rates of various categories of land were fixed by the Land Acquisition Collector for purpose of compensation accordingly. Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation determining market value of land acquired at Rs. 31,340/- and for trees Rs. 60/ -. Claimants received the compensation awarded u/ S. 11 of the Act under protest claiming higher compensation and desired a reference to Court u/s. 18 of the Act for determination of classification of the land and its market value. In the petition they asserted that rate would not be less than Rs. 3,000/- per gunth. (1 acre 25
REFERRED TO : Special Land Acquisition Officer, Davangare v. P.Veerabhadrappa
The Dollar Company, Madras v. Collector of Madras
The Collector of Kamrup v. Raj Chandra Sarma
Tribeni Devi v. The Collector, Ranchi
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India
State of Orissa v. Bharat Chandra Nayak
The State of West Bengal v. Shyamapada
Mirza Nausherwan Khan v. The Collector (Land Acquisition) Hyderabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.