SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ori) 62

J.M.MAHAPATRA, S.C.MOHAPATRA
LAND ACQUISITION ZONE OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
DAMBERUDHAR PRADHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.PATNAIK, G.C.TRIPATHY, N.P.Patnaik, S.C.ROY

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal u/s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on behalf of the State Government. No cross-objection has been filed by claimants.

( 2 ) ON basis of notification u/ S. 4 (1) of the Act published in the year 1984, land of different categories in various villages of various owners were acquired for Sambalpur-Talchar Rail Link. Two acres 44 decimals of cultivable agricultural land belonging to the claimants in village Badsar were acquired compulsorily. In near past, land in the nearby villages were acquired for National Alluminium Company. Rates of various categories of land were fixed by the Land Acquisition Collector for purpose of compensation accordingly. Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation determining market value of land acquired at Rs. 31,340/- and for trees Rs. 60/ -. Claimants received the compensation awarded u/ S. 11 of the Act under protest claiming higher compensation and desired a reference to Court u/s. 18 of the Act for determination of classification of the land and its market value. In the petition they asserted that rate would not be less than Rs. 3,000/- per gunth. (1 acre 25












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top