SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ori) 53

High Court Of Orissa
ARIJIT PASAYAT
ANWAR HUSSAIN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA - Respondent
CRI. MISC.  815  Of  1994
Decided On : 04/13/1994

Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Acharya, P.P.Dhal

In bailable offences, bail is a right and not a favour. The bail demanded should never be excessive with reference to social status of the party.

Headnote:

BAIL - BAILABLE OFFENCE - CONDITIONS - CASH SECURITY - UNREASONABLE - VARIATION.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner was arrested for an offence punishable under Section 47 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915. He was granted bail by the Judicial Magistrate, first class, Jaleswar, on condition that he furnish a bail bond of Rs. 2,000.00 with one surety and deposit cash security of Rs. 2,000.00. Petitioner challenged the condition of cash security, arguing that it was unreasonable and amounted to denial of bail.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the condition of cash security was unreasonable and set it aside. It directed the petitioner to furnish property security of Rs. 5,000.00 with one surety.

Issues: Whether the condition of cash security imposed by the Judicial Magistrate was reasonable.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the condition of cash security was unreasonable because it was not supported by any material and it virtually amounted to denial of bail. The court noted that the offence was bailable and that the petitioner was entitled to be released on bail as a matter of right. The court also noted that the petitioner was not a flight risk and that there was no reason to believe that he would abscond.

Final Decision: The court set aside the condition of cash security and directed the petitioner to furnish property security of Rs. 5,000.00 with one surety.

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.


( 1 ) LABELLING conditions imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, first class, Jaleswar while disposing of petitioner's application for bail to be unreasonable, and virtually denial of right to get bail this application has been filed.

( 2 ) ON the accusations of having committed offence punishable under Section 47 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (in short, the 'act') petitioner was arrested. He moved for bail before learned Judicial Magistrate, first class, Jaleswar. Learned Magistrate observed that alleged offence was bailable in nature. Petitioner was directed to be released on bail of Rs. 2,000. 00 with one surety for the like amount and to deposit cash security of Rs. 2,000. 00 since, according to learned Magistrate, there was likelihood of his absconding. Petitioner undisputedly has deposited the amount but has prayed for variation of the conditions. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the offence being bailable, and there being no material for the presumptive conclusion of the learned Judicial Magistrate that the petitioner was likely to abscond, direction for furnishing cash security of Rs. 2000. 00 is unreasonable. The learned counsel for state on the other hand submitted that in a given case cash security can be directed to be furnished. It would all depand on the nature of offence, and an offence under the Act being one which relates to illicit distilled liquor is of a serious nature. He fairly accepted that there was no material to support conclusion of learned Mag istrate that petitioner is likely to abscond. It is, however, submitted that since the offence was of a very serious nature, there was always possibility of the accused fleeing from justice.

( 3 ) IN the absence of any specific provision relating to furnishing of cash security and/or conditions which may be attached by a Magistrate while granting bail, it is within the judicial discre tion of the Magistrate concerned to impose such conditions or require furnishing of such security as the circumstances may require. Chapter XXXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, 'cri PC') deals with the provisions as to bails and bonds. There is no specific definition of bail as was observed by me in Surjan Kumar Naik and two others v. Republic of India (Criminal Misc. Case No. 425 of 1994 disposed of on 28-2-1994 ).

( 4 ) 'bail' remains as undefined term in the Crpc. Nowhere else the term has been statutorily defined. Conceptually, it continues to be under stood as a right for assertion of freedom against State imposed restraints. Since the U. N. Declara tion of Human Rights of 1948, to which India is a signatory, the concept of bail has found a place within the scope of human rights. The dictionary meaning of the expression 'bail' denotes a secu rity for appearance of a prisoner for his release. Itymologically, the word is derived from an old French verb 'bailer' which means to 'give' or 'to deliver', although another view is that its deriva tion is from the Latin term 'bajulara' meaning 'to bear a burden'. Bail is a conditional liberty, Stroud's Judicial Dictionary (Fourth Edition, 1971) spells out certain other details. It states : "when a man is taken or arrested for felony, suspicion of felony, indicted of felony, or any such case, so that he is restrained of his liberty. And being by law bailable, offereth surety to those which have authority to bail him, which sureties are bound for him to the kings use in a certaine summe of money, or body for body, that he shall appears before the Justices of Goale delivery at the next sessions etc. Then upon the bonds of these sureties, as in aforesaid, he is bailed that is to say, set at liberty until the day appointed for his appearance. " bail may thus be regarded as a mechanism whereby the State devolutes upon the community the function of securing the presence of the pris oners and at the same time involves participation of the community in admini





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top