High Court Of Orissa
A. S. NAIDU
SUKUMAR PANIGRAHI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA - Respondent
CRI. MISC. 134 Of 1998
Decided On : 01/04/2001
Section 197 - Protection of public servants - [Criminal Procedure Code] - [Sections 197, 323, 324, 355, 506 of the Indian Penal Code] - The judgment discusses the applicability of Section 197 of the Cr. P. C. in a case involving a Superintendent of Police accused of assault and related offenses. The court emphasizes the need to draw a line between strict official duty and acts outside its scope, and determines that the Superintendent of Police's actions were intermingled with the discharge of official duty, thus entitling him to the protection under Section 197, Cr. P. C.
Fact of the Case:
The judgment involves two interlinked criminal cases challenging orders related to alleged offenses by a Superintendent of Police during the discharge of his duties. The cases revolve around incidents of assault, obstruction of police duties, and subsequent legal proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Superintendent of Police's actions were intermingled with the discharge of his official duty, entitling him to the protection under Section 197, Cr. P. C. It also upheld the order taking cognizance of the offense in one of the cases, emphasizing the need for expeditious proceedings.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the applicability of Section 197, Cr. P. C. in the context of the Superintendent of Police's actions, the interlinking of the criminal cases, and the legality of the orders taking cognizance of the offenses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the determination that the Superintendent of Police's actions were intermingled with the discharge of his official duty, thus entitling him to the protection under Section 197, Cr. P. C. It also emphasized the need for expeditious proceedings in one of the cases.
Final Decision: Criminal Misc. Case No. 134 of 1998 was allowed, setting aside the impugned order, as the Superintendent of Police was entitled to the protection under Section 197, Cr. P. C. Criminal Misc. Case No. 2954 of 1998 was dismissed, with a directive for expeditious proceedings in the related case.
A. S. NAIDU, J.
( 1 ) THE facts of both the aforesaid criminal misc. cases are interlinked and connected or continuation of the same incident, hence, both the cases are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) CRIMINAL Misc. Case No. 134 of 1998 is filed challenging the order dated 19-9-97 passed by the sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phulbani in ICC case No. 28 of 1997 holding that there is sufficient ground to proceed against the petitioner with regard to commisssion of the alleged offence and the petitioner is not entitled to the protective umbrella provided under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
( 3 ) THE sole point which needs determination in the said case is as to whether the petitioner who was admittedly holding the post of Superintendent of Police and was posted at Phulbani at the releant time can be proceeded against in absence of a sanction as required under Section 197, Cr. P. C. For effectively answering the said question, it is necessary to dwelve into the facts of the case.
( 4 ) ON the basis of an F. I. R. lodged in Phulbani police station, two cases being P. S. Case No. 111 of 1997, (subsequently converted to G. R. Case No. 284 of 1997) as well as P. S. Case No. 112 of 1997 were initiated. F. I. R. of P. S. Case No. 111 of 1997 was lodged by one Suresh Kumar Behera who was the Sergeant in charge of A. P. R. force. Similarly, P. S. Case No. 112 of 1997 was registered on the basis of an F. I. R. lodged by one Purna Chandra Mishra, O. I. C. of Town P. S. Phulbani. Durga Prasad Tripathy and one Siba Prasad Tripathy were accused in P. S. Case No. 111 of 1997 whereas some of their friends and relatives are accused in P. S. Case No. 112 of 1997. The F. I. R. lodged at about 11. 10 p. m. on 13-9-97 reveals that while police was performing patrol duty in the bazar area, they received reliable information that some culprits of Town P. S. case Nos. 106, 107 and 108 of 1997 (dacoity and rioting cases) were hiding in the lodging of Kamala Kanta Pandey. On receiving the said information, the Sergeant along with the A. P. R. force tried to verify the matter, but Durga Prasad Tripathy who is the Manager of the said hotel did not allow him or the police personnel to enter into the hotel. It is further alleged that a Tata Sumo vehicle bearing Regisration number OR-05 D-3887 was parked in front of the hotel obstructing half of the road and the Manager refused to call the driver who was admittedly inside the hotel. When the police personnel wanted to enter into the hotel to call the driver and to investigate wheher the accused of the said dacoity cases were present in the hotel or not, they were physically obstructed and the Manager-Durga Prasad Tripathy dragged the Sergeant inside the hotel with a view to assault him. Seeing the said incident, the police personnel rushed to rescue the Sergeant and there was a tussle between the hotel staff and the police personnel, as a result of which said Durga Prasad Tripathy was pushed agains he gril gate and sustained some injuries. he A. P. R. force was able to rescue the Sergeant and thereafter apprehended Durga Prasad Tripathy whereas Siba Prasad Tripathy and some others who were present and obstructed police personnel from discharging their duties escaped.
( 5 ) THE second F. I. R. was lodged by one Purna Chandra Misra, O. I. C. of Town P. S. alleging that they brought Durga Prasad Tripathy, who had assaulted the Sergeant to the police station and noticed that he had a minor bleeding injury on his head. In order to give first aid, they took Durga Prasad Tripathy tot the district headquarters hospital. Dr. Dasarathi Mohapatra attended him. At the relevant time, Kamalakanta Pandey accompanied by his sons, son-in-law Siba Prasad Tripathy and others came and demanded release of the accused. They gheraoed him, abused in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences. They also threatened to attack the police station. It is further alleged tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.