SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ori) 13

S.N.SHANKAR, P.K.MOHANTY
GUNANIDHI MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, N. A. C. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MISRA, ASHOK DAS, B.B.RATHO, D.S.MISRA, G.A.Rao Dora, M.S.PANDA, S.D.Das, S.MOHANTY, S.N.SATPATHY

MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the validity of the appointment of Dr. Sri-krushna Sahu (opposite party No. 3) as the Second medical Officer of the Bhu-baneswar Notified Area Council is under challenge.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are these : the Notified Area Council by its Resolution No. 29 dated 31-10-1964 (Annexure a/1) decided to create the post of a Second Medical Officer and advertised the same on 1-8-1965 (An-nexure A/3 ). Opposite Party No. 3 was temporarily appointed to the post and he joined on 31-8-1965. On 23-7-1971 he applied to the Notified Area Council for study leave to undergo the condensed M. B. B. S. course (vide Annexure E/3 ). On 24-7-1971 the N. A. C. moved the State Government for necessary instructions regarding the nature and period of leave to be admissible to opposite party No. 3 and for posting of a substitute in his place (vide Annexure H/3 ). On 31-7-1971 the N. A. C. by its resolution No. 6 decided to relieve the opposite party No. 3 and to settle the nature of leave and the terms and conditions thereof later according to the directions of Government (vide Annexure G/3 ). On 12-8-1971 Government by their l




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top