S.N.SHANKAR, P.K.MOHANTY
GUNANIDHI MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, N. A. C. – Respondent
MOHANTI, J.
( 1 ) IN this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the validity of the appointment of Dr. Sri-krushna Sahu (opposite party No. 3) as the Second medical Officer of the Bhu-baneswar Notified Area Council is under challenge.
( 2 ) THE relevant facts are these : the Notified Area Council by its Resolution No. 29 dated 31-10-1964 (Annexure a/1) decided to create the post of a Second Medical Officer and advertised the same on 1-8-1965 (An-nexure A/3 ). Opposite Party No. 3 was temporarily appointed to the post and he joined on 31-8-1965. On 23-7-1971 he applied to the Notified Area Council for study leave to undergo the condensed M. B. B. S. course (vide Annexure E/3 ). On 24-7-1971 the N. A. C. moved the State Government for necessary instructions regarding the nature and period of leave to be admissible to opposite party No. 3 and for posting of a substitute in his place (vide Annexure H/3 ). On 31-7-1971 the N. A. C. by its resolution No. 6 decided to relieve the opposite party No. 3 and to settle the nature of leave and the terms and conditions thereof later according to the directions of Government (vide Annexure G/3 ). On 12-8-1971 Government by their l
P.L. Lakhanpal v. Ajit Nath Ray, Chief Justice of India, New Delhi
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal
Gadde Venkateswara Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Hari Shankar Prasad Gupta v. Sukhdeo Prasad
Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd v. State of West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.