R.N.MISRA, K.B.PANDA, P.K.MOHANTY
E. I. D. PARRY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AGRO SALES AND SERVICE AND ORS – Respondent
R. N. MISRA, J.
( 1 ) THESE appeals under the Orissa High Court Order are directed against the judgment of a learned single Judge in two miscellaneous appeals under Order 43, Rule 1 (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter called the Code) arising out of proceedings under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code. When the appeals were placed before a Division Bench, it directed that both the matters be placed before a larger Bench.
( 2 ) MONEY Suit No. 339 of 1970 was filed by the appellant in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge at Cuttack for recovery of Rs. 4,97,417. 08 paise on the plea that appellant as principal had supplied goods to the defendants, a partnership firm and two of its partners, on credit and they had failed to pay the price of the goods. Defendants entered contest but ultimately suffered an ex parte decree. Two separate applications--one by defendants 1 and 3 and the other by the second defendant of the suit -- were filed under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code read with Section 151 thereof for setting aside the ex parte decree. These applications were registered as Miscellaneous Cases Nos. 19 and 20 of 1975. On 25-11-1975, the learned trial Judge rejected both the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.