LINGARAJA RATH
DHULAMANI BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
LINGARAJA RATH, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner's conviction under S. 409 IPC and sentence to undergo R. I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/-, in default to undergo S. I. for three months having been upheld in appeal, he has preferred this revision.
( 2 ) THE petitioner was an Assistant District Welfare Officer at Talcher and was prosecuted for having committed misappropriation during the period 6-6-78 to 22-12-78 of a sum of Rs. 10,803. 88 out of an entrusted amount of Rs. 19,933. 53 which he had received towards the boarding charges, staff salary of Ashram School and stipend of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes students. The petitioner though admitted to be the disbursing officer along with the S. D. O. and the D. W. O. in respect of boarding charges, salary of staff of the school and the stipend of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes students, yet maintained a plea of complete denial of any entrustment of money to him.
( 3 ) MR. S. Misra I, learned counsel for the petitioners; assailing the conviction of the petitioner, has urged two contentions; firstly, that there was no valid sanction for the petitioner's prosecution, inasmuch as the sanction order was never prove
Janeshwar Das Aggarwal v. State of U. P.
Followed on : S.B.Saha v. M.S.Kochar
REFERRED TO : 1977 Cri LJ 173 : Rabindra Kumar Dey v. State of Orissa
Baijnath v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Krishan Kumar v. Union of India
Om Prakash Gupta v. State of U.P.
Prasanna Kumar Mohapatra v. The State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.