SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ori) 2

A.K.RATH
Premalata Samal @ Mahapatra – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioners:Mr.S.S.K.Nayak, Advocate
For Opp. party : Ms.Samapika Mishra, A.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Dr.A.K.RATH, J. - This petition challenges the order dated 22.11.2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr.Division), Bhubaneswar in C.S.No.2413 of 2016, whereby and whereunder, the learned trial court has returned the plaint to the plaintiffs-petitioners for non-compliance of notice under Section 80 (1) CPC on the Collector, Khurda.

2. The dispute lies in a narrow compass. The facts need not be recounted in details. Suffice it to say that the plaintiffs-petitioners instituted the suit for declaration of title. The plaintiffs issued notice under Section 80(1) CPC to the Chief Secretary of the State. The suit has been instituted against the State of Odisha represented by its Chief Secretary. The learned trial court came to hold that notice will not fall within the ambit of notice delivered to the officer himself who is being sued or at his office. Further the Collector, Khurda is a necessary party to the lis. Notice has not been served on him. Held so, it returned the plaint.

3. Heard Mr.S.S.K.Nayak-2, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Ms.Samapika Mishra, learned A.S.C. for the opposite party.

4. Mr.Nayak-2, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top