B.S.CHAUHAN, B.N.MAHAPATRA
TILOTTAMA KANHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, C.J. - This Writ Petition has been filed for quashing the orders under Annexure-6 dated 29.9.2004 and Annexure-7 dated 30.9.2004 by which the service of the Petitioner had been terminated and she had been relieved from service.
2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the case are that an advertisement dated 20.5.2000 was issued by the District Judge, Phulbani inviting applications for filling up four posts of Junior Stenographer in the judgeship of Kandhmal Boudh, Phulbani. The Petitioner had applied pursuant to the said advertisement. However, her name did not appear in the select list. All the posts were filled up. Subsequently, she had been offered appointment at a much later stage in spite of the fact that her name did not find place in the select list waiting list therein. It came to the knowledge of the Learned District Judge later on that Petitioner and Ors. had been appointed without any authority of law and without following any procedure prescribed by law. The Petitioner was served with a show-cause notice under Annexure-4. She had submitted her reply to the same under Annexure-5 and considering her reply, her services had been brought to
S. Pratap Singh Vs. The State of Punjab
State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Prabhu
Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation Vs. M/s. GAR Re-Rolling Mills and another
Union of India and others Vs. Major General Madan Lal Yadav (Retd.)
Smt. Shrisht Dhawan Vs. M/s. Shaw Brothers
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Jagannath (dead) by L.Rs. and others
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Singh and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.