B.S.CHAUHAN, B.N.MAHAPATRA
PRASANT KUMAR KHUNTIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.S. Chauhan, C.J. - This Writ Petition has been filed for issuing direction to the Opposite Parties to make payment of advocate fees along with 18% interest per annum.
2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the case are that Petitioner who was Addl. Standing Counsel for the Central Government had appeared in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Cuttack in a Rule of Court proceeding under Arbitration Act wherein the award of Rs. 40 lakhs passed against the Opposite Parties was set aside on his persuasion. The Petitioner/Learned advocate vide letter dated 23.6.1999 sent a bill of Rs. 4,40,350/- as Counsel fees, but the said demand was not acceded to by the Opposite Parties. In spite of several request, as no heed has been paid, he filed this Writ Petition.
3. Dr. A.K. Rath, Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has submitted that Petitioner is entitled for the aforesaid amount of fee/ad valorem as the award given by the Arbitrator has been set aside by the Civil Court on the argument advanced by the Petitioner.
4. Mr. J K. Misra, Learned Asst. Solicitor General, has submitted that fees of the advocate is to be paid as per the schedule and agreement betwee
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A.K. Saxena
Kerala State Electricity Board and Another Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil and Others
R.D. Saxena Vs. Balram Prasad Sharma
Smt. Gunwant Kaur and Others Vs. Municipal Committee, Bhatinda and Others
Govt. of Tamil Nadu and another Vs. R. Thillaivillalan
ABL International Ltd. and Another Vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.