SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ori) 588

B.S.CHAUHAN, B.N.MAHAPATRA
PRASANT KUMAR KHUNTIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

B.S. Chauhan, C.J. - This Writ Petition has been filed for issuing direction to the Opposite Parties to make payment of advocate fees along with 18% interest per annum.

2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the case are that Petitioner who was Addl. Standing Counsel for the Central Government had appeared in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Cuttack in a Rule of Court proceeding under Arbitration Act wherein the award of Rs. 40 lakhs passed against the Opposite Parties was set aside on his persuasion. The Petitioner/Learned advocate vide letter dated 23.6.1999 sent a bill of Rs. 4,40,350/- as Counsel fees, but the said demand was not acceded to by the Opposite Parties. In spite of several request, as no heed has been paid, he filed this Writ Petition.

3. Dr. A.K. Rath, Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has submitted that Petitioner is entitled for the aforesaid amount of fee/ad valorem as the award given by the Arbitrator has been set aside by the Civil Court on the argument advanced by the Petitioner.

4. Mr. J K. Misra, Learned Asst. Solicitor General, has submitted that fees of the advocate is to be paid as per the schedule and agreement betwee




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top