SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ori) 918

L.MOHAPATRA, I.MAHANTY
KISHORE CHANDRA MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

L. Mohapatra, J

1. The review Petitioner, who was opposite party No. 1 in W.P.(C) No. 224 of 2003 assails the judgment of this Court delivered in the said case as well as W.P.(C) No. 4493 of 2002.

2. The review Petitioner had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal in an application u/s 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act vide O.A. No. 542 of 1995 alleging therein that he had served for more than three years as Inspector of Income Tax and appeared in the Departmental Examination held during June/July 1995, but results were published on 12.2.1996. He was allowed two annual increments with retrospective effect, i.e., from 3.7.1995. During the period from June/July 1995 and publication of result on 12.2.1996, five posts of Income Tax Officer (Group-B) were sanctioned for Orissa Region and in order to fill up the said posts, a Departmental Promotion Committee meeting was convened on 13.10.1995. His case was not considered because the result of the Departmental Examination had not been declared by then. His grievance before the Tribunal was that he having already appeared in the Departmental Examination and the Departmental Promotion Committee having convened the meeti


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top