C.R.DASH
LINGARAJA MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
BINODINI MOHANTY – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.R. Dash, J. - Whether a lies pendens purchaser should be added as a party either Under Order-1 Rule-10 or Order-22, Rule-10, CPC is the main question that arises for consideration in the present writ petition.
2. The present petitioner is the plaintiff. He filed Civil Suit No.75 of 2003 in the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Puri inter alias for declaration that he (plaintiff) is the only legal successor of Swarnalata Mohanty and Radhashyam Mohanty of Kumbharpada, Puri and defendant no.1 (present opp. Party no.8) is not the legally married wife of said Radhashym Mohanty and defendant no.2 (present opp. Party no.1) is not the daughter of said Radhashyam Mohanty. He also sought for other incidental and ancillary reliefs as enumerated in paragraph-3 of the writ petition. Subrat Kumar Nayak (opp. party no.9) is the husband of Binodini Mohanty (defendant no.2-present opp. party no.1) and son-in-law of Bainamani Mohanty, (defendant no.1-present opp. party no.8). The aforesaid defendant no.1 and 2 filed their joint written statement denying the plaint averments. They appeared in the court through aforesaid Subrat Kumar Nayak (opp. party no.9), who is a practicin
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh Vs. Jai Prakash University and Others
Nagubai Ammal and Others Vs. B. Shama Rao and Others
Amit Kumar Shaw and Another Vs. Farida Khatoon and Another
Uchhab Patra Vs. Brundaban Mallik
Shuvam Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Babita Mohanty and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.