2020 Supreme(Ori) 61
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
Mohammad Rafiq, Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.
Mahendra Kumar Parida - Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 11977 of 2020
Decided On : 14-05-2020
Ishwar Mohanty, Advocate, Ashok Kumar Parija, Advocate
Cases Referred
K.S. Puttaswamy (retired) and another vs. Union of India and another, (2019) 1 SCC 1
The possession of Aadhaar Card and its number cannot be the sole criteria for registration, and various other documents should be accepted for the purpose of registration during the Lock-down period imposed due to the spread of pandemic Coronavirus (COVID19).
Headnote:
Aadhaar Card - Public Interest Litigation - Aadhaar Act, 2016, Section 7 - The court held that possession of Aadhaar Card and its number cannot be the sole criteria for registration of any migrant labourer and any other citizens entering the State of Odisha for the purpose of registration with State Portal or with the Gram Panchayat/Urban Local Bodies. The court referred to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, Section 7 and the decision of the Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy (retired) and another v. Union of India and another, (2019) 1 SCC 1 to support its decision. The court directed the respondent-State Authorities and Collectors of all the districts of the State to accept various other documents alongside the Aadhaar Card for the purpose of registration of migrant labourers and other traveling to the State of Odisha during the Lock-down period imposed on account of the spread of pandemic Coronavirus (COVID19).
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition challenged the decision of the Government of Odisha to consider Aadhar Card as the only proof of identification for migrant workers and other people in the COVID-19 Odisha State Portal and offline forms. The petitioner sought to direct the respondent-State to accept other ID proofs and argued that non-furnishing of Aadhaar number cannot be a criteria to deny entry into the State.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that possession of Aadhaar Card and its number cannot be the sole criteria for registration of migrant laborers and other citizens entering the State of Odisha. The court also found that various other documents alongside the Aadhaar Card should be accepted for the purpose of registration during the Lock-down period imposed due to the spread of pandemic Coronavirus (COVID19).
Issues: The issues involved the use of Aadhaar Card as the sole proof of identification for registration in the COVID-19 Odisha State Portal and offline forms, and the denial of entry into the State based solely on the non-furnishing of Aadhaar number.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the possession of Aadhaar Card and its number cannot be the sole criteria for registration and referred to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, Section 7 and the decision of the Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy (retired) and another v. Union of India and another, (2019) 1 SCC 1 to support its decision. The court directed the acceptance of various other documents alongside the Aadhaar Card for the purpose of registration during the Lock-down period imposed due to the spread of pandemic Coronavirus (COVID19).
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, directing the respondent-State Authorities and Collectors of all the districts of the State to act upon any of the aforementioned documents for the purpose of registration of migrant labourers and other traveling to the State of Odisha during the Lock-down period imposed on account of the spread of pandemic Coronavirus (COVID19).
JUDGMENT
Mohammad Rafiq, CJ. - This writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation has been filed by Mahendra Kumar Parida-petitioner questioning the decision of the Government of Odisha to consider Aadhar Card as the only proof of identification of the migrant workers and other people in the COVID-19 Odisha State Portal and offline forms available at Gram Panchayats or Urban Local Bodies for the purpose of registration.
2. Prayer has been made to direct the respondent-State to accept other ID proofs, such as Voter ID, Ration Card, MGNREGS ID Card etc. and in absence of any of them, the identification by the Sarpanch of Gram Panchyayat concerned attesting the identity of such migrant labourers, as valid proof for registration as an alternate to Aadhaar Card for registration in COVID-19 Odisha State Portal.
3. Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the respondent-State at the initiative of Union of India during the continuation of Lock-down 3 in the light of pandemic COVID-19 has taken a laudable decision to bring back several lakhs of Odia migrant labourers from other parts of the country to the State. It has for this purpose made an online portal-named COVID-19 Odisha State Portal (for short "the State Portal"), for registration of such returnees into the State. Simultaneously, forms have been made available at the Gram Panchayat Offices from where the relatives of such migrant labourers can procure and register them at the Panchayat Offices. Registration by either of the modes mandatorily requires Aadhaar Card with its number of the person willing to register as the only proof of identification. Those who are unable to submit the Aadhaar number would not be registered on the portal, thus depriving him/her from entering the State.
4. Referring to Section 7 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (for short 'the Aadhaar Act'), learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Aadhaar number can be used only for the purpose of establishing identity of individual for receipt of any such subsidy, benefit or service, which are incurred on the Consolidated Fund of India. Even the proviso to section 7 of the Aadhaar Act stipulates that if Aadhaar number is not assigned to an individual, then alternative and viable means of identification shall be offered to the individual for delivery of the subsidy, benefit or service. The registration process in the present case is aimed at regulating the entry of stranded migrant labourers and other persons who are willing to enter the State of Odisha. It has therefore no nexus with any of the stated purposes enumerated under Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his argument has relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy (retired) and another v. Union of India and another, (2019) 1 SCC 1 and argued that the majority opinion therein while interpreting the "benefits" and "services" categorically held that the scope is not to be unduly expanded thereby widening the net of Aadhaar, where it is not permitted otherwise.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also argued that every person including those who are permanent native of the State of Odisha, being citizens of the country, have fundamental right to reside and settle in any part of India guaranteed under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) of the Constitution of India. Non-furnishing of Aadhaar number cannot be a criteria to deny them entry into the State vis- -vis this action is only illegally and arbitrary.
7. Looking to the significance of the issue and the urgency of the situation, this Court, when the matter was listed on 12th of May, 2020, while issuing notice to the respondent-State, called upon the learned Advocate General to seek instructions of the State Government as to why, apart from Aadhaar Card, the other documents, such as Voter ID Card, Ration Card, MGNREGS ID Card