SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Ori) 68

SANJU PANDA, S.K.SAHOO
Suresh Chandra Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Goutam Mukherjee, Advocate, Partha Mukherji, Advocate, A.C. Panda, Advocate, Ankita Mukherji, Advocate, S. Sahoo, Advocate, S. Panda, Advocate, S.D. Ray, Advocate, Mohit Agarwal, Advocate, Soumya Priyadarsini, Advocate, Jyoti Prakash Patnaik, Advocate
Cases Referred
A. V. Fernandez -Vrs.- State of Kerala, (1957) AIR(SC) 657
Aswini Kumar Ghosh -Vrs.- Arabinda Bose, (1952) AIR(SC) 369
Deputy Director -Vrs.- S. Nagoor Meera, (1995) 3 SCC 377
Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway -Vrs.- T. R. Challapan, (1975) AIR(SC) 2216
Government of Andhra Pradesh -Vrs.- B. Jagjeevan Rao, (2014) 13 SCC 239
K. C. Sareen -Vrs.- C.B.I., Chandigarh, (2001) 6 SCC 584
Prasant Kumar Sahoo -Vrs.- State of Orissa, (2011) Supp2 OrissaLR 848
Ravikant S. Patil -Vrs.- Sarvabhouma S. Bagali, (2007) 1 SCC 673
State of Bihar -Vrs.- Bihar Rajya M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh, (2005) 9 SCC 129
State of Maharashtra -Vrs.- Balakrishna Dattatrya Kumbhar, (2012) 12 SCC 384
State of Orissa -Vrs.- Golekha Chandra Routray, (2015) 2 OrissaLR 480
State of Uttar Pradesh -Vrs.- Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., (1977) AIR(SC) 1132
Surya Narayan Acharya -Vrs.- State of Orissa, (2013) Supp1 OrissaLR 736
Union of India (UOI) and Ors. -Vrs.- Ramesh Kum, (1997) 7 SCC 514
Union of India (UOI) -Vrs.- V. K. Bhaskar, (1997) 11 SCC 383
Union of India -Vrs.- G. M. Kokil, (1984) Supp SCC 241
Union of India -Vrs.- Tulsiram Patel, (1985) 3 SCC 398
Whirlpool Corporation -Vrs.- Registrar of Trade Marks, (1998) 8 SCC 1

JUDGMENT

S. K. Sahoo, J. - The appellant Suresh Chandra Mishra has filed this appeal seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 30.09.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.17417 of 2019 wherein while declining to entertain the writ petition, liberty was granted to the appellant to approach the appropriate authority, if he is so advised. The appellant has further prayed to set aside the impugned order dated 07.09.2019 of his dismissal from Government service passed by the Disciplinary Authority and Director, Panchayati Raj & Drinking Water Department, Government of Odisha under Annexure-5.

2. The case of the appellant is that a vigilance case bearing Berhampur Vigilance P.S. Case No.04 dated 12.01.1994 for the offences under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under sections 409/477-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code was instituted against him on the F.I.R. presented by the Inspector of Vigilance, Paralakhemundi before the S.P., Vigilance, Berhampur on the accusation of misappropriation of Government money amount to the tune of Rs.52,000/- (rupees fifty two thousand only) of eleven beneficiaries by falsifying their acco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top