S.K.PANIGRAHI
Nandalal Rungta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.K. Panigrahi, J. - These petitions have been preferred under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer seeking quashing of the Chargesheet No. 7 dated 26.03.2013, filed by Balasore Vigilance P.S. in VGR Case No. 20 of 2011 and all criminal proceedings emanating therefrom; quashing of the order of cognizance dated 3.06.2013 passed in VGR Case No. 20 of 2011 by the Special Judge (Vigilance) Keonjhar and quashing of the Chargesheet No. 62 dated 31.12.2012 filed by Balasore Vigilance P.S. in VGR Case No. 21 of 2011 and all criminal proceedings emanating therefrom; quashing of the order of cognizance dated 22.02.2013 passed in VGR Case No. 21 of 2011 by the Special Judge (Vigilance) Keonjhar, for the alleged commission of offences u/s. 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('P.C. Act, 1988'), Sections 420/379/434/447/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 21(1) of the Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 ('MMDR Act, 1957') and Section 3 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 ('FC Act, 1980'). As both the p
Chandi Kumar Das Karmarkar vs. Abanidhar Roy
Common Cause vs. Union of India
E.G. Barsay vs. State of Bombay
Iridium Indian Telecom Limited vs. Motorola Inc.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. Datar Switchgear Ltd.
Maksud Saiyed vs. State of Gujarat
Pepsi Foods Ltd. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab
S.R. Sukumar vs. S. SunaadRaghuram
Sham Sunder vs. State of Haryana
Sharad Kumar Sanghi vs. SangitaRanem, (2015) 12 SCC 781
State of NCT of Delhi vs. Sanjay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.