SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 79

S.K.PANIGRAHI
Nandalal Rungta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. M.K. Mishra, Sr. Advocate, and S.Das, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sangram Das, Sc (Vigilance), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

S.K. Panigrahi, J. - These petitions have been preferred under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer seeking quashing of the Chargesheet No. 7 dated 26.03.2013, filed by Balasore Vigilance P.S. in VGR Case No. 20 of 2011 and all criminal proceedings emanating therefrom; quashing of the order of cognizance dated 3.06.2013 passed in VGR Case No. 20 of 2011 by the Special Judge (Vigilance) Keonjhar and quashing of the Chargesheet No. 62 dated 31.12.2012 filed by Balasore Vigilance P.S. in VGR Case No. 21 of 2011 and all criminal proceedings emanating therefrom; quashing of the order of cognizance dated 22.02.2013 passed in VGR Case No. 21 of 2011 by the Special Judge (Vigilance) Keonjhar, for the alleged commission of offences u/s. 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('P.C. Act, 1988'), Sections 420/379/434/447/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 21(1) of the Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 ('MMDR Act, 1957') and Section 3 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 ('FC Act, 1980'). As both the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top