JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J. - The petitioners, who were the opposite parties nos. 1 to 3 in the writ petition i.e. W.P.(C) No. 456 of 2013 filed by the opposite party Purna Chandra Chand, have sought for review of the order dated 24.04.2013 passed by a learned Division Bench of this Court while disposing of the writ petition.

The operative portion of the order dated 24.04.2013 is extracted herein below for ready reference:-

".....In view of the aforesaid law laid down, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to the salary of Headmaster for the period, for which he has worked as in-charge Headmaster, the opposite parties are directed to calculate his entitlements at the scale of pay of Headmaster for the period, for which he has worked and as stated, he is continuing as such and to pay such salary to him deducting the amount already received by him. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order."

2. The factual matrix in the case at hand, is that the opposite party Purna Chandra Chand herein, as the writ petitioner filed W.P.(C) No.456 of 2013 seeking for a direction to the petitioners of this review