SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 504

S. MURALIDHAR, B. P. ROUTRAY
Hrudananda Biswal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Goutam Mukherji, Senior Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S.R. Pattnaik, Advocate for Railways.

JUDGMENT

Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - Aggrieved by the refusal of the General Manager, South Eastern Railways, Kolkata (Opposite Party No.2) to accord him a right of passage over railway land in order to gain access to a public road on the eastern side of the plot purchased by him, the Petitioner approached this Court with the present writ petition in 2003.

2. The Petitioner has challenged the letter addressed to him on 6th July, 1993 by Opposite Party No.2 refusing such permission as well the communication addressed, almost ten years thereafter on 27th March, 2003, by Opposite Party No.2 to the then Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA), Odisha reiterating the decision.

3. The background facts are that, the Petitioner claims to be the owner in possession of the property situated on Plot No.1422/1493 (P) under Khata No.668 of mouza Ashok Nagar, Sub-Registry Bhubaneswar City (hereafter "the plot"), which he purchased by means of a Registered Sale Deed dated 21st April, 1977. The Record of Rights (RoR) in respect of the plot is stated to have been mutated thereafter in the Petitioner"s name.

4. The Petitioner states that he applied for and got building permission from the Bhubaneswar D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top