SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 270

R.K.PATTANAIK, S.MURALIDHAR
Ramakanta Rath – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chandrakanta Nayak.
For the Respondent: P.K. Muduli.

JUDGMENT :

R.K. PATTANAIK, J.

1. Instant writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 is at the behest of the Petitioner challenging decision of Registrar (Judicial)-cum-Disciplinary Authority, High Court of Orissa (O.P. No. 1) for not considering his departmental promotion with effect from 3rd December, 2002 instead of 30th June, 2006 and to consider the same in compliance of the order of this Court dated 11th December, 2012 passed in M.C. No. 17027 of 2012 arising out of W.P. (C) No. 15607 of 2005 by according seniority to him from the date when his juniors were promoted and in consonance with the gradation list dated 26th April, 2001 prepared vis-a-vis Senior Assistant and as per the civil list published and corrected up to October, 2013.

2. Initially the Petitioner joined as a Lower Divisional Assistant on 23rd February, 1981 and was later promoted to the higher post as per the seniority and pursuant to the decision of O.P. No. 1 from time to time but he was deprived of promotion to the post of Section Officer (as it was Superintendent Level-II by then) to which he was otherwise eligible according to the seniority and gradation list dated 26th April,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top