IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K. Sahoo, J.
Gopinath Khillo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
Bail Application No. 10096 of 2022
Decided On : 09-12-2022
N.D.P.S Act - Bail Application - The court granted interim bail to the petitioner for a period of three months considering slow progress of trial, the petitioner's compliance with earlier interim bail order, and the period of detention in judicial custody.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for bail after being taken into judicial custody for offences under the N.D.P.S Act. The earlier bail application was rejected, and the trial was progressing slowly.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted interim bail to the petitioner for a period of three months, with the condition to surrender before the trial court at the end of the period. The petitioner was required to furnish a bail bond and adhere to specified terms and conditions.
Issues: Bail application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. for offences under the N.D.P.S Act, slow progress of trial, compliance with earlier interim bail order, and period of detention in judicial custody.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the slow progress of trial, the petitioner's compliance with the earlier interim bail order, and the period of detention in judicial custody as grounds for granting interim bail.
Final Decision: The court granted interim bail to the petitioner for a period of three months, subject to specified terms and conditions.
JUDGMENT
S.K. Sahoo, J. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
3. This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Semiliguda P.S. Case No.109 of 2019 corresponding to T.R. Case No.31 of 2019 pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Koraput for offences punishable under sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/25 of the N.D.P.S Act.
4. The petitioner moved an application for bail before the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge -cum-Special Judge, Koraput, which was rejected on 12.09.2022.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was taken into judicial custody in connection with this case on 11.11.2019 and earlier he was granted interim bail for a period of three months in BLAPL No. 5146 of 2021 as per order dated 08.04.2022 and after availing the same, he surrendered at right time. It is further submitted that the petitioner is local man and there is no chance of his absconding. He further submitted that in the learned trial Court, there is no progress in the trial and in view of delayed disposal of the trial, the petitioner may be granted interim bail for some period.
6. Status report submitted by the learned trial Court dated 06.12.2022 indicates about examination of two witnesses out of eleven witnesses so far.
7. Learned counsel for the State has no serious objection for grant of interim bail to the petitioner.
8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, conduct of the petitioner in complying with the earlier interim bail order, slow progress of trial, the petitioner is a local man and there is no chance of absconding, conduct of the petitioner in complying with the earlier interim bail order and further taking into account the period of detention of the petitioner in judicial custody, while not inclining to release the petitioner on bail on merit, I am inclined to release the petitioner on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of release. The petitioner shall surrender before the learned trial Court immediately on expiry of the three months period.
9. For the above period, let the petitioner be released on interim bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin over the matter with further terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem just and proper including the conditions that he shall not indulge in any criminal activities, shall not try to tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall appear before the learned trial Court on each date to which the case would be posted for trial during the interim bail period.
10. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of interim bail.
11. Accordingly, the BLAPL is disposed of.
12. Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
The court may grant interim bail considering the slow progress of trial, the petitioner's compliance with earlier interim bail order, and the period of detention in judicial custody.
The court may grant interim bail considering the period of detention, absence of chance of tampering with evidence or absconding, and the progress of the trial, even if not inclined to release the pe....
The court may grant interim bail considering the period of detention and slow progress of the trial, even if not inclined to grant bail on merit.
The court has the discretion to grant interim bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to make interim bail absolute based on the filing of the response and supplementary charge-sheet.
The court's decision on interim bail applications is influenced by the specific grounds presented in the bail applications and the nature of accusations in the FIR.
The court has the discretion to grant interim bail to an accused, subject to conditions to ensure their availability and prevent them from committing any offenses or intimidating witnesses.
Interim bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. can be granted based on personal circumstances, but must consider the gravity of the offense.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.