Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(J&K) 604

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAMMU
Rajnesh Oswal, J.
Arfana Parveen – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu And Kashmir – Respondent
Bail App No. 78 of 2022
Decided On : 09-09-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rishabh K Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA, for the Respondent

The court has the discretion to make interim bail absolute based on the filing of the response and supplementary charge-sheet.

Headnote:
Interim Bail - Granting of Absolute Interim Bail - The court made the interim bail granted to the petitioner absolute based on the filing of the response and supplementary charge-sheet.
Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was granted interim bail, which was made absolute after the filing of the response and supplementary charge-sheet.
Finding of the Court:

The court made the interim bail granted to the petitioner absolute on the same terms and conditions.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision: The interim bail granted to the petitioner was made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court vide order dated 04.03.2022.

2. Response stands filed in which factual aspects of the case have been narrated and it has been stated that supplementary charge-sheet too has been filed. In view of this, interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 04.03.2022 is made absolute on same terms and conditions.

3. Disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document