SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 444

S. K. SAHOO
Gopal Gouda – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.S. Ray 2, Advocate, Susamarani Sahoo, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3. This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Gangapur P.S. Case No.182 of 2020 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 49 of 2020 pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Aska for offence punishable under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The petitioner moved an application for bail before the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Aska, which was rejected on 12.04.2022.

5. During course of argument, learned counsel for the State submitted that even though the two eye witnesses, namely Jitendra Gouda (P.W.2) and Laxmi Swain (P.W.6) have not supported the prosecution case, but the informant Pitabas Gouda being examined as P.W. 8 stated about the dying declaration of the deceased Pintu @ Krutibasha Gouda, who was his brother and in the dying declaration, the deceased has specifically named the petitioner and one Surendra Dakua along with seven to eight others to whom he could not identify due to darkness, to be his assailants.

6. When a query was made to the learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top