S. MURALIDHAR, C. R. DASH
Milu @ Rashmi Ranjan Jena – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - This appeal is directed against the order dated 17th December 2013, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Puri in S.T. Case No.37/365 of 2013/2012, convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for seven years with a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default to undergo RI for a period of six months and further convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for life with a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default to undergo RI for six months. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court found the Appellant guilty of raping and murdering by setting on fire an adolescent minor girl of 15 years.
3. The case of the prosecution as spoken to by Ranjana Swain (PW-1), the mother of the deceased, was that the deceased was in friendly terms with the Appellant which was disapproved by the family members of the deceased. They asked the deceased to discontinue her relationship with the Appellant despite which, the deceased was stated to be still
K. Ramachandra Reddy vs. Public Prosecutor (1976) 3 SCC 618)
Laxman vs. State of Maharashtra (2002) 6 SCC 710
Mohanlal Gangaram Gehani v.State of Maharashtra
Paniben vs. State of Gujarat (1992) 2 SCC 474
Panneerselvam vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2008) 17 SCC 190
Puran Chand vs. State of Haryana (2010) 6 SCC 566
Ram Manorath vs. State of U.P. (1981) 2 SCC 654)
Ramawati Devi vs. State of Bihar (1983) 1 SCC 211
Rasheed Beg vs. State of M.P. (1974) 4 SCC 264)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.