HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
RAJAN ROY, RAJEEV BHARTI
Sujeet – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and initiation of investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. details of medical examination and death. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. key issues for consideration. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. reliance on dying declaration. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. arguments made by counsel. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's evaluation of the reliability of evidence. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. judicial standards for dying declarations. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. necessity of voluntary and truthful statements. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 9. errors in the recording process affecting reliability. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 10. conclusion on the legal standard of proof. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. final judgment and implications. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 12. outcome of the appeal and release order. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
Judgment :
Rajeev Bharti, J.
1. The present criminal appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. has been filed by the accused/appellant, namely, Sujeet s/o Nanhke, r/o Mohalla Haniya Tola, Police Station- Kheri, District- Lakhimpur Kheri challenging the judgment and order 06.05.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur Kheri in S.T. No.15 of 2019, arising out o


Paparambaka Rosamma and others Vs. State of A.P.
Lokesh and Ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Naresh Kumar Vs. Kalawati and others
Samsul Haque Vs. State of Assam
A dying declaration is only valid if the victim was in a fit mental state to give it, which wasn't established; thus, conviction based solely on it is unsafe.
A dying declaration must be made when the victim is in a fit mental state; mere consciousness is insufficient for reliability.
Dying declarations must be substantiated by medical fitness certifications and corroborating witness accounts; failure to do so undermines their reliability leading to altered convictions.
A dying declaration must be trustworthy and corroborated; significant discrepancies in the statement led to acquittal due to reasonable doubt not established by prosecution.
The court ruled that a dying declaration must be credible and recorded under proper conditions; discrepancies and lack of corroborative evidence led to the acquittal of the appellant.
A dying declaration must be supported by evidence of the declarant's mental fitness; absence of such certification undermines its reliability as a basis for conviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.