SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 91

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
RAJAN ROY, RAJEEV BHARTI, JJ.
Sujeet – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1633 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Atul Verma, Akhilendra Pratap Singh
For the Respondent: Ravish Chandra Mishra, A.G.A.

A dying declaration is only valid if the victim was in a fit mental state to give it, which wasn't established; thus, conviction based solely on it is unsafe.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code - Section 302, 498-A, 304-B - D.P. Act - Conviction and sentencing of life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC - Acquittal under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Section 4 D.P. Act - Insufficient evidence regarding the reliability of the dying declaration, lack of certification of mental fitness, major discrepancies in testimony and investigation, leading to reasonable doubt. (Paras 46, 45)

(B) Dying Declaration - Evidentiary value - A dying declaration can only be relied upon if it is established that it was made voluntarily and the victim was in a fit mental state at the time of making it, which was not proved in this case. (Paras 29, 25)

(C) Burden of Proof - The prosecution must establish charges beyond reasonable doubt, and incomplete or inconsistent evidence cannot suffice for conviction. (Paras 41, 42)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for murder of his wife Hema, who suffered severe burn injuries under suspicious circumstances, and the conviction primarily relied upon her dying declaration.

Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the murder charge beyond a reasonable doubt considering the doubts surrounding the dying declaration.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was based largely on an unreliable dying declaration influenced by medical factors, which were not verified; consequently, the conviction could not be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution's case rested on an uncorroborated dying declaration, which lacked the necessary reliability due to deficient investigation and contradictions in the evidence presented.

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction quashed and accused acquitted.

Table of Content
1. background of the case and initiation of investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. details of medical examination and death. (Para 10 , 11)
3. key issues for consideration. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. reliance on dying declaration. (Para 16 , 17)
5. arguments made by counsel. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. court's evaluation of the reliability of evidence. (Para 23 , 24)
7. judicial standards for dying declarations. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. necessity of voluntary and truthful statements. (Para 32 , 33)
9. errors in the recording process affecting reliability. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. conclusion on the legal standard of proof. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
11. final judgment and implications. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. outcome of the appeal and release order. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)

Judgment :

Rajeev Bharti, J.

1. The present criminal appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. has been filed by the accused/appellant, namely, Sujeet s/o Nanhke, r/o Mohalla Haniya Tola, Police Station- Kheri, District- Lakhimpur Kheri challenging the judgment and order 06.05.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur Kheri in S.T. No.15 of 2019, arising out of Crime No.198 of 2018, Police Station- Kheri, District- Lakhimpur Kheri, convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 I.P.C. with a fine of Rs.5,000/-. In default of payment of fine to further undergo one month simple imprisonment. The accused/appellant was acquitted from the charges under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 4 of D.P. Act. The alternate charge under Section 302 I.P.C. was found proved. The appellant is in jail. He remained incarcerated for 8 years, 01 month and 08 days with remission as per Report dated 18.11.2025.

Factual Matrix of the case

2. Prosecution story, in brief, is that the deceased Hema, wife of the appellant, was subjected to cruelty for dowry and was set on fire on 16.06.2018, as a result she succumbed to her burn injuries on 05.07.2018. The complainant, father of the deceased, Raju (P.W.1), lodged a police report on 16.06.2018 stating that he had solemnized marriage of his daughter Hema about three years ago with Sujeet s/o Nanhke, r/o Haniya Tola, Kheri. On 16.06.2018 at about 8:00 P.M. he heard some noise and came in the locality and when he went towards that place, he saw that there was chaos in the house where his daughter was married, when he reached near the house, he found his daughter Hema was burning with fire outside the door of the house. There was no person present inside the house, as all had fled. Raju-PW-1, in his statement, has stated that when the deceased was taken to hospital by the accused, he also went along. He has further stated that his daughter (deceased) was suffering from mental illness and, on account of the same, she poured oil on herself and set herself ablaze. He has also stated that accused Sujeet had got Hema treated. According to the complainant, his son-in-law, Sujeet s/o Nanhke along with mother-in-law-Arjunia and sisters-in-law, namely, Rekha, Shakuntala and Rinki, set his daughter ablaze. He (the complainant) had made every possible efforts to save his daughter, but she had already sustained severe burn injuries. He immediately took his daughter to the District Hospital where her condition was stated to be extremely serious.

3. On the basis of the aforesaid report, FIR under Sections 147, 307 I.P.C. came to be lodged on 17.06.2018 at 12:05 P.M. and was registered by Shri Umesh Pratap Singh (P.W.8), Constable at Nighasan Police Station, who deposed that he was present at the Kheri Police Station on that date and at about 12:05 P.M., the complainant, Raju s/o Thakur Prasad, r/o Bukhari Tola, Kheri town and police station, came to the police station and submitted a written complaint. He deposed that investigation of the case was assigned to Sub-Inspector Shri Vishambhar Dayal Singh. During cross-examination, Shri Umesh Pratap Singh (P.W.8)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top