B. P. SATAPATHY
Abinash Mallick – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard Mr. Ramnath Acharya, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. A.P. Das, learned ASC appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. The present writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
'In view of the facts mentioned above the applicant prays for the following relief:-
i) The order dated 8.4.2016 of the Government under Annexure-11 may kindly be quashed so far as the applicant is concerned.
ii) The order dated 5.5.2016 issued by the Executive Engineer, Mahanadi Barrage Division under Annexure-12 be quashed.
iii) The respondent Nos.1 & 2 be directed to consider the case of the applicant for appointment under R.A. Scheme within a stipulated period.
iv) And/or may kindly also grant any other relief and/or reliefs which your Lordship think deem fit and proper for the benefit of the applicant.'
4. It is submitted that on the death of the Petitioner's father on 03.03.2010 while working as Store Choukidar at Mahanadi Barrage Division, Cuttack, the mother of the Petitioner made an application for her appointment under the provision of Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.